In the context of the current COVID-19 pandemic, households throughout the world have to cope with negative shocks. Previous research has shown that negative shocks impair cognitive function and change risk, time and social preferences. In this study, we analyze the results of a longitudinal multi-country survey conducted in Italy (N = 1652), Spain (N = 1660) and the United Kingdom (N = 1578). We measure cognitive function using the Cognitive Reflection Test and preferences traits (risk, time and social preferences) using an experimentally validated set of questions to assess the differences between people exposed to a shock compared to the rest of the sample. We measure four possible types of shocks: labor market shock, health shock, occurrence of stressful events, and mental health shock. Additionally, we randomly assign participants to groups with either a recall of negative events (more specifically, a mild reinforcement of stress or of fear/anxiety), or to a control group (to recall neutral or joyful memories), in order to assess whether or not stress and negative emotions drive a change in preferences. Results show that people affected by shocks performed worse in terms of cognitive functioning, are more risk loving, and are more prone to punish others (negative reciprocity). Data do not support the hypotheses that the result is driven by stress or by negative emotions.

Negative shocks predict change in cognitive function and preferences: assessing the negative affect and stress hypothesis / Bogliacino, Francesco; Codagnone, Cristiano; Montealegre, Felipe; Folkvord, Frans; Gómez, Camilo; Charris, Rafael; Liva, Giovanni; Lupiáñez‑villanueva, Francisco; Veltri, Giuseppe A.. - In: SCIENTIFIC REPORTS. - ISSN 2045-2322. - 11:(2021).

Negative shocks predict change in cognitive function and preferences: assessing the negative affect and stress hypothesis

Giuseppe A. Veltri
2021-01-01

Abstract

In the context of the current COVID-19 pandemic, households throughout the world have to cope with negative shocks. Previous research has shown that negative shocks impair cognitive function and change risk, time and social preferences. In this study, we analyze the results of a longitudinal multi-country survey conducted in Italy (N = 1652), Spain (N = 1660) and the United Kingdom (N = 1578). We measure cognitive function using the Cognitive Reflection Test and preferences traits (risk, time and social preferences) using an experimentally validated set of questions to assess the differences between people exposed to a shock compared to the rest of the sample. We measure four possible types of shocks: labor market shock, health shock, occurrence of stressful events, and mental health shock. Additionally, we randomly assign participants to groups with either a recall of negative events (more specifically, a mild reinforcement of stress or of fear/anxiety), or to a control group (to recall neutral or joyful memories), in order to assess whether or not stress and negative emotions drive a change in preferences. Results show that people affected by shocks performed worse in terms of cognitive functioning, are more risk loving, and are more prone to punish others (negative reciprocity). Data do not support the hypotheses that the result is driven by stress or by negative emotions.
2021
Bogliacino, Francesco; Codagnone, Cristiano; Montealegre, Felipe; Folkvord, Frans; Gómez, Camilo; Charris, Rafael; Liva, Giovanni; Lupiáñez‑villanueva...espandi
Negative shocks predict change in cognitive function and preferences: assessing the negative affect and stress hypothesis / Bogliacino, Francesco; Codagnone, Cristiano; Montealegre, Felipe; Folkvord, Frans; Gómez, Camilo; Charris, Rafael; Liva, Giovanni; Lupiáñez‑villanueva, Francisco; Veltri, Giuseppe A.. - In: SCIENTIFIC REPORTS. - ISSN 2045-2322. - 11:(2021).
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
s41598-021-83089-0.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.08 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.08 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/292125
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 24
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 22
social impact