Stereotype threat effects occur when members of a stigmatized group perform poorly on a task because they fear confirming a negative stereotype that is associated with their ingroup. The present study investigates whether the observed achievement gap in standardized testing between high- and low-socioeconomic status (SES) American students can be due, in part, to this phenomenon. Participants were placed in one of four conditions that varied in level of ‘‘threat’’ related to socioeconomic status. Results show that when socioeconomic identity is made salient before taking a test, or when the test is presented as diagnostic of intelli- gence, low-SES students perform significantly worse, and report much lower self- confidence, than low-SES participants in the non-threatening conditions. When threatening conditions converge, performance of low-SES students is at its worst level. These results help us better understand the role stereotyping plays in the academic performance of low-SES students, and may partly explain the disparity on standardized test scores between low- and high-SES students.
Social class is dead, long live social class! Stereotype threat among low-socioeconomic individuals / Spencer, B; Castano, E. - In: SOCIAL JUSTICE RESEARCH. - ISSN 0885-7466. - STAMPA. - 20:4(2007), pp. 418-432. [10.1007/s11211-007-0047-7]
Social class is dead, long live social class! Stereotype threat among low-socioeconomic individuals
Castano E
2007-01-01
Abstract
Stereotype threat effects occur when members of a stigmatized group perform poorly on a task because they fear confirming a negative stereotype that is associated with their ingroup. The present study investigates whether the observed achievement gap in standardized testing between high- and low-socioeconomic status (SES) American students can be due, in part, to this phenomenon. Participants were placed in one of four conditions that varied in level of ‘‘threat’’ related to socioeconomic status. Results show that when socioeconomic identity is made salient before taking a test, or when the test is presented as diagnostic of intelli- gence, low-SES students perform significantly worse, and report much lower self- confidence, than low-SES participants in the non-threatening conditions. When threatening conditions converge, performance of low-SES students is at its worst level. These results help us better understand the role stereotyping plays in the academic performance of low-SES students, and may partly explain the disparity on standardized test scores between low- and high-SES students.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
2007SpencerCastano_SJR.pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
132.44 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
132.44 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione