This paper introduces BD2BB, a novel language and vision benchmark that requires multimodal models combine complementary information from the two modalities. Recently, impressive progress has been made to develop universal multimodal encoders suitable for virtually any language and vision tasks. However, current approaches often require them to combine redundant information provided by language and vision. Inspired by real-life communicative contexts, we propose a novel task where either modality is necessary but not sufficient to make a correct prediction. To do so, we first build a dataset of images and corresponding sentences provided by human participants. Second, we evaluate state-of-the-art models and compare their performance against human speakers. We show that, while the task is relatively easy for humans, best-performing models struggle to achieve similar results.
Be Different to Be Better! A Benchmark to Leverage the Complementarity of Language and Vision / Pezzelle, Sandro; Greco, Claudio; Gandolfi, Greta; Gualdoni, Eleonora; Bernardi, Raffaella. - (2020), pp. 2751-2767. (Intervento presentato al convegno Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2020: EMNLP 2020 tenutosi a Online nel 16th – 20th November 2020) [10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.248].
Be Different to Be Better! A Benchmark to Leverage the Complementarity of Language and Vision
Pezzelle, Sandro;Bernardi, Raffaella
2020-01-01
Abstract
This paper introduces BD2BB, a novel language and vision benchmark that requires multimodal models combine complementary information from the two modalities. Recently, impressive progress has been made to develop universal multimodal encoders suitable for virtually any language and vision tasks. However, current approaches often require them to combine redundant information provided by language and vision. Inspired by real-life communicative contexts, we propose a novel task where either modality is necessary but not sufficient to make a correct prediction. To do so, we first build a dataset of images and corresponding sentences provided by human participants. Second, we evaluate state-of-the-art models and compare their performance against human speakers. We show that, while the task is relatively easy for humans, best-performing models struggle to achieve similar results.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
2020.findings-emnlp.248.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
3.97 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
3.97 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione