The ability to build and expertly manipulate manual tools sets humans apart from other animals. Watching images of manual tools has been shown to elicit a distinct pattern of neural activity in a network of parietal areas, assumingly because tools entail a potential for action—a unique feature related to their functional use and not shared with other manipulable objects. However, a question has been raised whether this selectivity reflects a processing of low-level visual properties—such as elongated shape that is idiosyncratic to most tool-objects—rather than action-specific features. To address this question, we created and behaviourally validated a stimulus set that dissociates objects that are manipulable and nonmanipulable, as well as objects with different degrees of body extension property (tools and non-tools), while controlling for object shape and low-level image properties. We tested the encoding of action-related features by investigating neural representations in two parietal regions of interest (intraparietal sulcus and superior parietal lobule) using functional MRI. Univariate differences between tools and non-tools were not observed when controlling for visual properties, but strong evidence for the action account was nevertheless revealed when using a multivariate approach. Overall, this study provides further evidence that the representational content in the dorsal visual stream reflects encoding of action-specific properties.

It's not all about looks: The role of object shape in parietal representations of manual tools / Matić, Karla; Op de Beeck, Hans; Bracci, Stefania. - In: CORTEX. - ISSN 0010-9452. - ELETTRONICO. - 133:(2020), pp. 358-370. [10.1016/j.cortex.2020.09.016]

It's not all about looks: The role of object shape in parietal representations of manual tools

Bracci, Stefania
2020-01-01

Abstract

The ability to build and expertly manipulate manual tools sets humans apart from other animals. Watching images of manual tools has been shown to elicit a distinct pattern of neural activity in a network of parietal areas, assumingly because tools entail a potential for action—a unique feature related to their functional use and not shared with other manipulable objects. However, a question has been raised whether this selectivity reflects a processing of low-level visual properties—such as elongated shape that is idiosyncratic to most tool-objects—rather than action-specific features. To address this question, we created and behaviourally validated a stimulus set that dissociates objects that are manipulable and nonmanipulable, as well as objects with different degrees of body extension property (tools and non-tools), while controlling for object shape and low-level image properties. We tested the encoding of action-related features by investigating neural representations in two parietal regions of interest (intraparietal sulcus and superior parietal lobule) using functional MRI. Univariate differences between tools and non-tools were not observed when controlling for visual properties, but strong evidence for the action account was nevertheless revealed when using a multivariate approach. Overall, this study provides further evidence that the representational content in the dorsal visual stream reflects encoding of action-specific properties.
2020
Matić, Karla; Op de Beeck, Hans; Bracci, Stefania
It's not all about looks: The role of object shape in parietal representations of manual tools / Matić, Karla; Op de Beeck, Hans; Bracci, Stefania. - In: CORTEX. - ISSN 0010-9452. - ELETTRONICO. - 133:(2020), pp. 358-370. [10.1016/j.cortex.2020.09.016]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Matic_etal_2020.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: articolo principale
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.45 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.45 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/282156
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact