In this study, we addressed the relevance of the state-trait variance decomposition of global self-esteem (GSE) in organizational research. We used a longitudinal sample of 393 military cadets followed for 2 years (nT2 = 376) and adopted Latent Curve—Latent State-Trait models for separating stable and transient factors in GSE and in three work-related variables (e.g., work engagement, affective commitment, in-role/extra-role performance). Although literature often considered GSE a trait-like variable, our results showed that it has a significant state variance that positively covaried with the state components of all three work-related variables included in our study. Thus, we suggest rejecting the rigid separation between “state-constructs” and “trait-constructs”, and recommend a paradigm that focuses on the trait and state components of each psychological construct.
A Latent State-Trait analysis of global self-esteem: A reconsideration of its state-like component in an organizational setting / Perinelli, Enrico; Alessandri, Guido. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT. - ISSN 0965-075X. - STAMPA. - 28:4(2020), pp. 465-483. [10.1111/ijsa.12308]
A Latent State-Trait analysis of global self-esteem: A reconsideration of its state-like component in an organizational setting
Perinelli, Enrico;Alessandri, Guido
2020-01-01
Abstract
In this study, we addressed the relevance of the state-trait variance decomposition of global self-esteem (GSE) in organizational research. We used a longitudinal sample of 393 military cadets followed for 2 years (nT2 = 376) and adopted Latent Curve—Latent State-Trait models for separating stable and transient factors in GSE and in three work-related variables (e.g., work engagement, affective commitment, in-role/extra-role performance). Although literature often considered GSE a trait-like variable, our results showed that it has a significant state variance that positively covaried with the state components of all three work-related variables included in our study. Thus, we suggest rejecting the rigid separation between “state-constructs” and “trait-constructs”, and recommend a paradigm that focuses on the trait and state components of each psychological construct.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Perinelli & Alessandri 2020.pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
862 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
862 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione