Although counterproductive work behaviors can be extremely damaging to organizations and society as a whole, we do not yet fully understand the link between employees’ organizational attachment and their intention to engage in such behaviors. Based on social identity theory, we predicted a negative relationship between organizational identification and counterproductive work behaviors. We also predicted that this relationship would be moderated by ambivalent identification. We explored counterproductive work behaviors toward the organization (CWB-O) and other individuals (CWB-I). Study 1, a survey of 198 employees, revealed that employees who identified strongly with their organization reported lower levels of CWB-O, but as predicted, only when ambivalent identification was low. Study 2 involved a manipulation in the form of a scenario presented to 228 U.S. employees, generally replicated the findings of Study 1: the link between organizational identification and CWB-O was stronger for participants in the low ambivalence condition than for those in the high ambivalence condition. The interaction effect of ambivalent and organizational identification on CWB-I was only marginally significant in the second study. These findings provide new evidence for the positive influence of organizational identification under conditions of low ambivalence on counterproductive behaviors toward an organization.

Ambivalent Identification as a Moderator of the Link Between Organizational Identification and Counterproductive Work Behaviors / Ciampa, Valeria; Sirowatka, Moritz; Schuh, Sebastian C.; Fraccaroli, Franco; van Dick, Rolf. - In: JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS. - ISSN 0167-4544. - STAMPA. - 169:1(2021), pp. 119-134. [10.1007/s10551-019-04262-0]

Ambivalent Identification as a Moderator of the Link Between Organizational Identification and Counterproductive Work Behaviors

Ciampa, Valeria;Fraccaroli, Franco;van Dick, Rolf
2021-01-01

Abstract

Although counterproductive work behaviors can be extremely damaging to organizations and society as a whole, we do not yet fully understand the link between employees’ organizational attachment and their intention to engage in such behaviors. Based on social identity theory, we predicted a negative relationship between organizational identification and counterproductive work behaviors. We also predicted that this relationship would be moderated by ambivalent identification. We explored counterproductive work behaviors toward the organization (CWB-O) and other individuals (CWB-I). Study 1, a survey of 198 employees, revealed that employees who identified strongly with their organization reported lower levels of CWB-O, but as predicted, only when ambivalent identification was low. Study 2 involved a manipulation in the form of a scenario presented to 228 U.S. employees, generally replicated the findings of Study 1: the link between organizational identification and CWB-O was stronger for participants in the low ambivalence condition than for those in the high ambivalence condition. The interaction effect of ambivalent and organizational identification on CWB-I was only marginally significant in the second study. These findings provide new evidence for the positive influence of organizational identification under conditions of low ambivalence on counterproductive behaviors toward an organization.
2021
1
Ciampa, Valeria; Sirowatka, Moritz; Schuh, Sebastian C.; Fraccaroli, Franco; van Dick, Rolf
Ambivalent Identification as a Moderator of the Link Between Organizational Identification and Counterproductive Work Behaviors / Ciampa, Valeria; Sirowatka, Moritz; Schuh, Sebastian C.; Fraccaroli, Franco; van Dick, Rolf. - In: JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS. - ISSN 0167-4544. - STAMPA. - 169:1(2021), pp. 119-134. [10.1007/s10551-019-04262-0]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Ciampa2021_Article_AmbivalentIdentificationAsAMod.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 914.53 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
914.53 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
final accepted version.pdf

Open Access dal 02/08/2021

Tipologia: Post-print referato (Refereed author’s manuscript)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 444.89 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
444.89 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/276358
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 28
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 27
social impact