The attentional spatial-numerical association of response codes (Att-SNARC) effect (Fischer, Castel, Dodd, & Pratt, 2003)—the finding that participants are quicker to detect left-side targets when the targets are preceded by small numbers and quicker to detect right-side targets when they are preceded by large numbers—has been used as evidence for embodied number representations and to support strong claims about the link between number and space (e.g., a mental number line). We attempted to replicate Experiment 2 of Fischer et al. by collecting data from 1,105 participants at 17 labs. Across all 1,105 participants and four interstimulus-interval conditions, the proportion of times the effect we observed was positive (i.e., directionally consistent with the original effect) was .50. Further, the effects we observed both within and across labs were minuscule and incompatible with those observed by Fischer et al. Given this, we conclude that we failed to replicate the effect reported by Fischer et al. In addition, our analysis of several participant-level moderators (finger-counting habits, reading and writing direction, handedness, and mathematics fluency and mathematics anxiety) revealed no substantial moderating effects. Our results indicate that the Att-SNARC effect cannot be used as evidence to support strong claims about the link between number and space.
Registered Replication Report on Fischer, Castel, Dodd, and Pratt (2003) / Colling, Lincoln J.; Szűcs, Dénes; De Marco, Damiano; Cipora, Krzysztof; Ulrich, Rolf; Nuerk, Hans-Christoph; Soltanlou, Mojtaba; Bryce, Donna; Chen, Sau-Chin; Schroeder, Philipp Alexander; Henare, Dion T.; Chrystall, Christine K.; Corballis, Paul M.; Ansari, Daniel; Goffin, Celia; Sokolowski, H. Moriah; Hancock, Peter J. B.; Millen, Ailsa E.; Langton, Stephen R. H.; Holmes, Kevin J.; Saviano, Mark S.; Tummino, Tia A.; Lindemann, Oliver; Zwaan, Rolf A.; Lukavský, Jiří; Becková, Adéla; Vranka, Marek A.; Cutini, Simone; Mammarella, Irene Cristina; Mulatti, Claudio; Bell, Raoul; Buchner, Axel; Mieth, Laura; Röer, Jan Philipp; Klein, Elise; Huber, Stefan; Moeller, Korbinian; Ocampo, Brenda; Lupiáñez, Juan; Ortiz-Tudela, Javier; de la Fuente, Juanma; Santiago, Julio; Ouellet, Marc; Hubbard, Edward M.; Toomarian, Elizabeth Y.; Job, Remo; Treccani, Barbara; Mcshane, Blakeley B.. - In: ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE. - ISSN 2515-2459. - ELETTRONICO. - 3:2(2020), pp. 143-162. [10.1177/2515245920903079]
Registered Replication Report on Fischer, Castel, Dodd, and Pratt (2003)
Mulatti, Claudio;Ortiz-Tudela, Javier;Job, Remo;Treccani, Barbara;
2020-01-01
Abstract
The attentional spatial-numerical association of response codes (Att-SNARC) effect (Fischer, Castel, Dodd, & Pratt, 2003)—the finding that participants are quicker to detect left-side targets when the targets are preceded by small numbers and quicker to detect right-side targets when they are preceded by large numbers—has been used as evidence for embodied number representations and to support strong claims about the link between number and space (e.g., a mental number line). We attempted to replicate Experiment 2 of Fischer et al. by collecting data from 1,105 participants at 17 labs. Across all 1,105 participants and four interstimulus-interval conditions, the proportion of times the effect we observed was positive (i.e., directionally consistent with the original effect) was .50. Further, the effects we observed both within and across labs were minuscule and incompatible with those observed by Fischer et al. Given this, we conclude that we failed to replicate the effect reported by Fischer et al. In addition, our analysis of several participant-level moderators (finger-counting habits, reading and writing direction, handedness, and mathematics fluency and mathematics anxiety) revealed no substantial moderating effects. Our results indicate that the Att-SNARC effect cannot be used as evidence to support strong claims about the link between number and space.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
colling et al., 2020.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: first online
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
671.86 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
671.86 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
2515245920903079.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
676.63 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
676.63 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione