This article carries out a quantitative analysis of the military behaviour of Italy from 1946 to 2010 using neoclassical realism as the theoretical framework. By overcoming the limits of traditional explanations of Italian security and defence policies, neoclassical realism provides new insight into Italy’s involvement in militarized interstate disputes by taking into account both systemic and domestic variables. The method used is a combination of dyad analysis introduced by Stuart Bremer in 1992 and the analysis of unit-level variables, which is distinctive of neoclassical realism. An analytical model is developed, and bivariate and multivariate analyses are performed to explain the impact of the variables. By empirically testing a set of hypotheses, the study argues that Italian military behaviour is a function of the country’s relative power as well as the levels of elite instability and regime vulnerability, the extraction capacity of the state, and the degree of elite consensus. The study contributes to the existing scientific debate on the determinants of Italian international behaviour and to the literature on neoclassical realism by demonstrating that its main propositions apply to a case of middle power and that these propositions can be tested on a large scale through quantitative approaches.

Neoclassical realism and Italy’s military behaviour, 1946–2010: a combined dyad/nation analysis / Rosa, Paolo; Benati, Stefano; Foradori, Paolo; Longoni, Gian Marco. - In: POLITICAL RESEARCH EXCHANGE. - ISSN 2474-736X. - 2020, 2:1(2020), p. 1770103. [10.1080/2474736X.2020.1770103]

Neoclassical realism and Italy’s military behaviour, 1946–2010: a combined dyad/nation analysis

Rosa, Paolo
Primo
;
Benati, Stefano
Secondo
;
Foradori, Paolo
Penultimo
;
Longoni, Gian Marco
Ultimo
2020-01-01

Abstract

This article carries out a quantitative analysis of the military behaviour of Italy from 1946 to 2010 using neoclassical realism as the theoretical framework. By overcoming the limits of traditional explanations of Italian security and defence policies, neoclassical realism provides new insight into Italy’s involvement in militarized interstate disputes by taking into account both systemic and domestic variables. The method used is a combination of dyad analysis introduced by Stuart Bremer in 1992 and the analysis of unit-level variables, which is distinctive of neoclassical realism. An analytical model is developed, and bivariate and multivariate analyses are performed to explain the impact of the variables. By empirically testing a set of hypotheses, the study argues that Italian military behaviour is a function of the country’s relative power as well as the levels of elite instability and regime vulnerability, the extraction capacity of the state, and the degree of elite consensus. The study contributes to the existing scientific debate on the determinants of Italian international behaviour and to the literature on neoclassical realism by demonstrating that its main propositions apply to a case of middle power and that these propositions can be tested on a large scale through quantitative approaches.
2020
1
Rosa, Paolo; Benati, Stefano; Foradori, Paolo; Longoni, Gian Marco
Neoclassical realism and Italy’s military behaviour, 1946–2010: a combined dyad/nation analysis / Rosa, Paolo; Benati, Stefano; Foradori, Paolo; Longoni, Gian Marco. - In: POLITICAL RESEARCH EXCHANGE. - ISSN 2474-736X. - 2020, 2:1(2020), p. 1770103. [10.1080/2474736X.2020.1770103]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
PRXX1770103.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 324.05 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
324.05 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/266059
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 8
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact