We tackle the problem of planning in nondeterministic domains, by presenting a new approach to conformant planning. Conformant planning is the problem of finding a sequence of actions which is guaranteed to achieve the goal despite the nondeterminism of the domain. Our approach is based on the representation of the planning domain as a finite state automaton. We use Symbolic Model Checking techniques, in particular Binary Decision Diagrams, to compactly represent and efficiently search the automaton. In this paper we make the following contributions. First, we present a general planning algorithm for conformant planning, which applies to fully nondeterministic domains, with uncertainty in the initial condition and in action effects. The algorithm is based on a breadth-first, backward search, and returns conformant plans of minimal length, if a solution to the planning problem exists, otherwise it terminates concluding that the problem admits no conformant solution. Second, we provide a symbolic representation of the search space based on Binary Decision Diagrams (BDDs), which allows for the application of search techniques derived from symbolic model checking. The symbolic representation makes it possible to analyze sets of transitions in a single computation step. Third, we present CMBP (Conformant Model Based Planner), an efficient implementation of the data structures and algorithm described above, directly based on BDD manipulations, which allows for a compact representation of the search layers and an efficient implementation of the search steps. Finally, we present an experimental comparison of our approach with the state of the art conformant planners CGP, QBFPLAN and GPT. Our analysis includes all the planning problems from the distribution packages of these systems, plus other problems defined to stress some specific factors. Our approach appears to be the most effective. CMBP is strictly more expressive than QBFPLAN and CGP. In all the problems for which a comparison was possible, CMBP outperformed its competitors, sometimes by orders of magnitude
Conformant Planning via Symbolic Model Checking / Cimatti, Alessandro; Roveri, Marco. - In: THE JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH. - ISSN 1076-9757. - 13:(2000), pp. 305-338.
Conformant Planning via Symbolic Model Checking
Alessandro Cimatti;Marco Roveri
2000-01-01
Abstract
We tackle the problem of planning in nondeterministic domains, by presenting a new approach to conformant planning. Conformant planning is the problem of finding a sequence of actions which is guaranteed to achieve the goal despite the nondeterminism of the domain. Our approach is based on the representation of the planning domain as a finite state automaton. We use Symbolic Model Checking techniques, in particular Binary Decision Diagrams, to compactly represent and efficiently search the automaton. In this paper we make the following contributions. First, we present a general planning algorithm for conformant planning, which applies to fully nondeterministic domains, with uncertainty in the initial condition and in action effects. The algorithm is based on a breadth-first, backward search, and returns conformant plans of minimal length, if a solution to the planning problem exists, otherwise it terminates concluding that the problem admits no conformant solution. Second, we provide a symbolic representation of the search space based on Binary Decision Diagrams (BDDs), which allows for the application of search techniques derived from symbolic model checking. The symbolic representation makes it possible to analyze sets of transitions in a single computation step. Third, we present CMBP (Conformant Model Based Planner), an efficient implementation of the data structures and algorithm described above, directly based on BDD manipulations, which allows for a compact representation of the search layers and an efficient implementation of the search steps. Finally, we present an experimental comparison of our approach with the state of the art conformant planners CGP, QBFPLAN and GPT. Our analysis includes all the planning problems from the distribution packages of these systems, plus other problems defined to stress some specific factors. Our approach appears to be the most effective. CMBP is strictly more expressive than QBFPLAN and CGP. In all the problems for which a comparison was possible, CMBP outperformed its competitors, sometimes by orders of magnitudeI documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione