In this work we develop an empirically driven model of visual attention to multiple words using the word-word interference (WWI) task. In this task, two words are simultaneously visually presented, a to-be-ignored distractor word at fixation and a to-be-read-aloud target word above or below the distractor word. Experiment 1 showed that low frequency distractor words interfere more than high frequency distractor words. Experiment 2 showed that distractor frequency (high vs. low) and target frequency (high vs. low) exert additive effects. Experiment 3 showed that the effect of the case status of the target (same vs. AlTeRnAtEd) interacts with the type of distractor (word vs. string of # marks). Experiment 4 showed that targets are responded to faster in the presence of semantically related distractors than in presence of unrelated distractors. Our model of visual attention to multiple words borrows from the dual-route cascaded model of reading two principles governing processing dynamics: cascaded interactive activation and lateral inhibition. At the core of the model are three mechanisms aimed at dealing with the distinctive feature of the WWI task, which is that two words are simultaneously presented. These mechanisms are identification, tokenization, and deactivation.
What can we learn about visual attention to multiple words from the word-word interference task? / Mulatti, C.; Ceccherini, L.; Coltheart, M.. - In: MEMORY & COGNITION. - ISSN 0090-502X. - ELETTRONICO. - 43:1(2015), pp. 121-132. [10.3758/s13421-014-0450-x]
What can we learn about visual attention to multiple words from the word-word interference task?
C. Mulatti;
2015-01-01
Abstract
In this work we develop an empirically driven model of visual attention to multiple words using the word-word interference (WWI) task. In this task, two words are simultaneously visually presented, a to-be-ignored distractor word at fixation and a to-be-read-aloud target word above or below the distractor word. Experiment 1 showed that low frequency distractor words interfere more than high frequency distractor words. Experiment 2 showed that distractor frequency (high vs. low) and target frequency (high vs. low) exert additive effects. Experiment 3 showed that the effect of the case status of the target (same vs. AlTeRnAtEd) interacts with the type of distractor (word vs. string of # marks). Experiment 4 showed that targets are responded to faster in the presence of semantically related distractors than in presence of unrelated distractors. Our model of visual attention to multiple words borrows from the dual-route cascaded model of reading two principles governing processing dynamics: cascaded interactive activation and lateral inhibition. At the core of the model are three mechanisms aimed at dealing with the distinctive feature of the WWI task, which is that two words are simultaneously presented. These mechanisms are identification, tokenization, and deactivation.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
mulatti.ceccherini.coltheart2015.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Abstract + Main Text
Tipologia:
Post-print referato (Refereed author’s manuscript)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
556.51 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
556.51 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione