Background and objectives: It is well known that socially anxious individuals show biased processing towards threatening faces and better performance with low spatial frequencies information (LSF). It is unclear whether this bias is confined to facial processing or can be extended to other types of information. Methods: Two experimental phases involving discrimination tasks considering neutral and angry facial expressions and everyday objects in two different spatial frequency conditions were conducted to compare the performance of “socially and non-socially anxious individuals”. Results: Findings showed that highly socially anxious individuals (HSAi) were faster in decision processing for LSF neutral faces than LSF angry faces and responded more slowly to LSF angry faces than unfiltered angry faces. Moreover, they responded more quickly to LSF object images than low socially anxious individuals (LSAi). Limitations: The fact that the participants were not diagnosed with social anxiety disorder limits the relevance of clinical findings. The study is further limited because it compared and contrasted only two emotional expressions and two frequency bands. Conclusions: Study results showed that HSAi better process LSF neutral information and that this advantage is not limited to neutral faces alone, but extends across other domains.

Socially anxious individuals perform better using low spatial frequency information to process facial expressions and objects / Novara, Caterina; Pardini, Susanna; Mulatti, Claudio. - In: JOURNAL OF BEHAVIOR THERAPY AND EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHIATRY. - ISSN 0005-7916. - STAMPA. - 64:(2019), pp. 99-105. [10.1016/j.jbtep.2019.03.002]

Socially anxious individuals perform better using low spatial frequency information to process facial expressions and objects

Mulatti, Claudio
2019-01-01

Abstract

Background and objectives: It is well known that socially anxious individuals show biased processing towards threatening faces and better performance with low spatial frequencies information (LSF). It is unclear whether this bias is confined to facial processing or can be extended to other types of information. Methods: Two experimental phases involving discrimination tasks considering neutral and angry facial expressions and everyday objects in two different spatial frequency conditions were conducted to compare the performance of “socially and non-socially anxious individuals”. Results: Findings showed that highly socially anxious individuals (HSAi) were faster in decision processing for LSF neutral faces than LSF angry faces and responded more slowly to LSF angry faces than unfiltered angry faces. Moreover, they responded more quickly to LSF object images than low socially anxious individuals (LSAi). Limitations: The fact that the participants were not diagnosed with social anxiety disorder limits the relevance of clinical findings. The study is further limited because it compared and contrasted only two emotional expressions and two frequency bands. Conclusions: Study results showed that HSAi better process LSF neutral information and that this advantage is not limited to neutral faces alone, but extends across other domains.
2019
Novara, Caterina; Pardini, Susanna; Mulatti, Claudio
Socially anxious individuals perform better using low spatial frequency information to process facial expressions and objects / Novara, Caterina; Pardini, Susanna; Mulatti, Claudio. - In: JOURNAL OF BEHAVIOR THERAPY AND EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHIATRY. - ISSN 0005-7916. - STAMPA. - 64:(2019), pp. 99-105. [10.1016/j.jbtep.2019.03.002]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
SocialAnx.2019.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Abstract + Main Text
Tipologia: Post-print referato (Refereed author’s manuscript)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 342.94 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
342.94 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/250405
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact