In the dominant narrative of bioethics and biomedical discourse on publicUmbilical Cord Blood (UCB) banking, the ethical value of donating UCB isunproblematically associated with the clinical quality of collected UCB. Thisarticle shows that this view is analytically untenable as it overlooks tensions andconflicts between the social values of donation and the clinical value of bankedUCB in concrete arrangements regarding the logistics of UCB donation andcollection. Adopting the notion of registers of valuing (Heuts and Mol 2013:Valuation Studies, 1, 2, 125–46) and analysing the case of the Italian network ofpublic UCB banks and collection sites, this article shows how conflicting registersof valuing concerning UCB can shape different organisational models of UCBdonation and collection, in which social values and clinical value are notunproblematically conflated. The article aims to demonstrate that the functioningof biobanking arrangements is dependent on how different values areaccomplished and aligned in concrete practices of tissue donation and collection.
Values in tension. Clinical quality and civic participation in umbilical cord blood banking in Italy / Beltrame, Lorenzo. - In: SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS. - ISSN 0141-9889. - 2020, 42:4(2019), pp. 689-704. [10.1111/1467-9566.13049]
Values in tension. Clinical quality and civic participation in umbilical cord blood banking in Italy
Beltrame, Lorenzo
2019-01-01
Abstract
In the dominant narrative of bioethics and biomedical discourse on publicUmbilical Cord Blood (UCB) banking, the ethical value of donating UCB isunproblematically associated with the clinical quality of collected UCB. Thisarticle shows that this view is analytically untenable as it overlooks tensions andconflicts between the social values of donation and the clinical value of bankedUCB in concrete arrangements regarding the logistics of UCB donation andcollection. Adopting the notion of registers of valuing (Heuts and Mol 2013:Valuation Studies, 1, 2, 125–46) and analysing the case of the Italian network ofpublic UCB banks and collection sites, this article shows how conflicting registersof valuing concerning UCB can shape different organisational models of UCBdonation and collection, in which social values and clinical value are notunproblematically conflated. The article aims to demonstrate that the functioningof biobanking arrangements is dependent on how different values areaccomplished and aligned in concrete practices of tissue donation and collection.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Final paper_Beltrame.docx
Solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Pre-print non referato (Non-refereed preprint)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
68.43 kB
Formato
Microsoft Word XML
|
68.43 kB | Microsoft Word XML | Visualizza/Apri |
Beltrame_Sociology of Health and Illness.pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
149.01 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
149.01 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
convert. in PDF Final paper_Beltrame.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Pre-print non referato (Non-refereed preprint)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
166.42 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
166.42 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione