Biological vision relies on representations of the physical world at different levels of complexity. Relevant features span from simple low-level properties, as contrast and spatial frequencies, to object-based attributes, as shape and category. However, how these features are integrated into coherent percepts is still debated. Moreover, these dimensions often share common biases: for instance, stimuli from the same category (e.g., tools) may have similar shapes. Here, using magnetoencephalography, we revealed the temporal dynamics of feature processing in human subjects attending to objects from six semantic categories. By employing Relative Weights Analysis, we mitigated collinearity between model-based descriptions of stimuli and showed that low-level properties (contrast and spatial frequencies), shape (medial-axis) and category are represented within the same spatial locations early in time: 100–150 ms after stimulus onset. This fast and overlapping processing may result from independent parallel computations, with categorical representation emerging later than the onset of low-level feature processing, yet before shape coding. Categorical information is represented both before and after shape, suggesting a role for this feature in the refinement of categorical matching.

Common spatiotemporal processing of visual features shapes object representation / Papale, P.; Betta, M.; Handjaras, G.; Malfatti, Giulia; Cecchetti, L.; Rampinini, A.; Pietrini, P.; Ricciardi, E.; Turella, L.; Leo, A.. - In: SCIENTIFIC REPORTS. - ISSN 2045-2322. - 9:1(2019), p. 7601. [10.1038/s41598-019-43956-3]

Common spatiotemporal processing of visual features shapes object representation

Malfatti, Giulia;Ricciardi E.;Turella L.;
2019-01-01

Abstract

Biological vision relies on representations of the physical world at different levels of complexity. Relevant features span from simple low-level properties, as contrast and spatial frequencies, to object-based attributes, as shape and category. However, how these features are integrated into coherent percepts is still debated. Moreover, these dimensions often share common biases: for instance, stimuli from the same category (e.g., tools) may have similar shapes. Here, using magnetoencephalography, we revealed the temporal dynamics of feature processing in human subjects attending to objects from six semantic categories. By employing Relative Weights Analysis, we mitigated collinearity between model-based descriptions of stimuli and showed that low-level properties (contrast and spatial frequencies), shape (medial-axis) and category are represented within the same spatial locations early in time: 100–150 ms after stimulus onset. This fast and overlapping processing may result from independent parallel computations, with categorical representation emerging later than the onset of low-level feature processing, yet before shape coding. Categorical information is represented both before and after shape, suggesting a role for this feature in the refinement of categorical matching.
2019
1
Papale, P.; Betta, M.; Handjaras, G.; Malfatti, Giulia; Cecchetti, L.; Rampinini, A.; Pietrini, P.; Ricciardi, E.; Turella, L.; Leo, A.
Common spatiotemporal processing of visual features shapes object representation / Papale, P.; Betta, M.; Handjaras, G.; Malfatti, Giulia; Cecchetti, L.; Rampinini, A.; Pietrini, P.; Ricciardi, E.; Turella, L.; Leo, A.. - In: SCIENTIFIC REPORTS. - ISSN 2045-2322. - 9:1(2019), p. 7601. [10.1038/s41598-019-43956-3]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
papale19.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 1.78 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.78 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/239898
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact