This paper examines the role of ownership and market competition in Vietnamese firms’ total factor productivity (TFP) from 2001 to 2011. Making use of a large panel dataset of manufacturing firms, we find that, on average, both foreign-owned enterprises (FOEs) and state-owned enterprises (SOEs) have performed better than privately owned enterprises (POEs) in terms of their TFP levels. However, while FOEs’ TFP ranked the highest in the period 2001–2006, SOEs “closed the gap” in the period 2007–2011. Moreover, we find that market competition has been effective in enhancing average firm productivity and in reducing the gaps in efficiency across ownership types. SOEs’ remarkable performance may be linked to several concurrent factors experienced during the period 2001–2011, namely, the process of restructuring the state sector during the 2000s, the increased economic integration due to the country’s accession to the World Trade Organisation (2007) and, finally, the preferential access to financial capital and land granted to SOEs. While some evidence supports SOEs’ equitization as an explanation for their remarkable productivity performance, WTO accession and cheaper access to inputs do not fully explain it.

From central planning towards a market economy: The role of ownership and competition in Vietnamese firms’ productivity / Le, Manh-Duc; Pieri, Fabio; Zaninotto, Enrico. - In: JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE ECONOMICS. - ISSN 0147-5967. - ELETTRONICO. - 2019, 47:3(2019), pp. 693-716. [10.1016/j.jce.2019.04.002]

From central planning towards a market economy: The role of ownership and competition in Vietnamese firms’ productivity

Pieri, Fabio;Zaninotto, Enrico
2019-01-01

Abstract

This paper examines the role of ownership and market competition in Vietnamese firms’ total factor productivity (TFP) from 2001 to 2011. Making use of a large panel dataset of manufacturing firms, we find that, on average, both foreign-owned enterprises (FOEs) and state-owned enterprises (SOEs) have performed better than privately owned enterprises (POEs) in terms of their TFP levels. However, while FOEs’ TFP ranked the highest in the period 2001–2006, SOEs “closed the gap” in the period 2007–2011. Moreover, we find that market competition has been effective in enhancing average firm productivity and in reducing the gaps in efficiency across ownership types. SOEs’ remarkable performance may be linked to several concurrent factors experienced during the period 2001–2011, namely, the process of restructuring the state sector during the 2000s, the increased economic integration due to the country’s accession to the World Trade Organisation (2007) and, finally, the preferential access to financial capital and land granted to SOEs. While some evidence supports SOEs’ equitization as an explanation for their remarkable productivity performance, WTO accession and cheaper access to inputs do not fully explain it.
2019
3
Le, Manh-Duc; Pieri, Fabio; Zaninotto, Enrico
From central planning towards a market economy: The role of ownership and competition in Vietnamese firms’ productivity / Le, Manh-Duc; Pieri, Fabio; Zaninotto, Enrico. - In: JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE ECONOMICS. - ISSN 0147-5967. - ELETTRONICO. - 2019, 47:3(2019), pp. 693-716. [10.1016/j.jce.2019.04.002]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
LPZ_JCE2019_issue.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 1.19 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.19 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
From central planning Final re-submitted.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Pre-print non referato (Non-refereed preprint)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 1.21 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.21 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/236191
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 18
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 16
social impact