Resource allocation has been a main policy issue in cash‐for‐care schemes (CfCs) for older people in Europe since their inception. It regards how publicly funded care benefits and services are distributed among older people. The raising pressures of an ageing population and the tensions on the financial sustainability of welfare regimes in place have further exacerbated the relevance of this topic over the recent years. Nevertheless, comparative research so far has overlooked changes in resource allocation in CfCs over time. This article contributes to fill this gap, exploring changes in resource allocation of CfCs for older people in a sample of European countries —Austria, England, France, Germany, Italy, and The Netherlands— since the early '90s (or since the introduction of the scheme). It examines three analytical dimensions: (a) The mix of public services and benefits provided to older people (CfCs, community services in kind, residential care); (b) the level of CfCs coverage; and (c) its generosity. A combined view of these dimensions leads to the discussion of two dilemmas: How to allocate the resources devoted to CfCs in the light of the trade‐off between its coverage and intensity? And, within the whole long‐term care system, how to allocate resources between CfCs and services in kind?

Cash‐for‐care payments in Europe: Changes in resource allocation / Gori, Cristiano; Morciano, Marcello. - In: SOCIAL POLICY & ADMINISTRATION. - ISSN 1467-9515. - 53:4(2019), pp. 537-550. [https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12498]

Cash‐for‐care payments in Europe: Changes in resource allocation

Gori, Cristiano;
2019-01-01

Abstract

Resource allocation has been a main policy issue in cash‐for‐care schemes (CfCs) for older people in Europe since their inception. It regards how publicly funded care benefits and services are distributed among older people. The raising pressures of an ageing population and the tensions on the financial sustainability of welfare regimes in place have further exacerbated the relevance of this topic over the recent years. Nevertheless, comparative research so far has overlooked changes in resource allocation in CfCs over time. This article contributes to fill this gap, exploring changes in resource allocation of CfCs for older people in a sample of European countries —Austria, England, France, Germany, Italy, and The Netherlands— since the early '90s (or since the introduction of the scheme). It examines three analytical dimensions: (a) The mix of public services and benefits provided to older people (CfCs, community services in kind, residential care); (b) the level of CfCs coverage; and (c) its generosity. A combined view of these dimensions leads to the discussion of two dilemmas: How to allocate the resources devoted to CfCs in the light of the trade‐off between its coverage and intensity? And, within the whole long‐term care system, how to allocate resources between CfCs and services in kind?
2019
4
Gori, Cristiano; Morciano, Marcello
Cash‐for‐care payments in Europe: Changes in resource allocation / Gori, Cristiano; Morciano, Marcello. - In: SOCIAL POLICY & ADMINISTRATION. - ISSN 1467-9515. - 53:4(2019), pp. 537-550. [https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12498]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Gori_Morciano -2019-Social_Policy_&_Administration.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 443.35 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
443.35 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
SPA_VersionAccepted12012019.pdf

Open Access dal 01/07/2021

Tipologia: Post-print referato (Refereed author’s manuscript)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 232.8 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
232.8 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/232892
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 10
social impact