Why is the winner-loser gap in political support wider in some countries and narrower in others?Previous studies have focused on how theinputside of political systems (i.e., the institutional structure)affects the winner-loser gap. This study suggests that one should also consider theoutputside (i.e., thequality of political process and economic performance) and posits that two mechanisms – rational andpsychological – can explain how output factors affect the gap. Going beyond previous research, this articlealso considers whether contextual characteristics explain the variation in the gap not only between countries,but also within them. Applying mixed models to survey data from 30 European countries between 2002 and2015, the study finds that the differences in support between winners and losers across countries are smallerin consensual systems, as in these contexts the support among losers is higher. However, changes in theinstitutional structure do not explain the over-time variation in the winner-loser gap. Moreover, increasingquality of process and economic performance do not attenuate the gap across countries and over time, asthey affect positively the political support of both winners and losers. The study shows which contextualfactors explain the winner-loser gap and points to the conditions that increase losers’ consent, which is acrucial element of democratic legitimacy.

Political support among winners and losers: Within- and between-country effects of structure, process and performance in Europe / Martini, Sergio; Quaranta, Mario. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL RESEARCH. - ISSN 0304-4130. - 2019, 58:1(2019), pp. 341-361. [10.1111/1475-6765.12284]

Political support among winners and losers: Within- and between-country effects of structure, process and performance in Europe

Quaranta, Mario
2019-01-01

Abstract

Why is the winner-loser gap in political support wider in some countries and narrower in others?Previous studies have focused on how theinputside of political systems (i.e., the institutional structure)affects the winner-loser gap. This study suggests that one should also consider theoutputside (i.e., thequality of political process and economic performance) and posits that two mechanisms – rational andpsychological – can explain how output factors affect the gap. Going beyond previous research, this articlealso considers whether contextual characteristics explain the variation in the gap not only between countries,but also within them. Applying mixed models to survey data from 30 European countries between 2002 and2015, the study finds that the differences in support between winners and losers across countries are smallerin consensual systems, as in these contexts the support among losers is higher. However, changes in theinstitutional structure do not explain the over-time variation in the winner-loser gap. Moreover, increasingquality of process and economic performance do not attenuate the gap across countries and over time, asthey affect positively the political support of both winners and losers. The study shows which contextualfactors explain the winner-loser gap and points to the conditions that increase losers’ consent, which is acrucial element of democratic legitimacy.
2019
1
Martini, Sergio; Quaranta, Mario
Political support among winners and losers: Within- and between-country effects of structure, process and performance in Europe / Martini, Sergio; Quaranta, Mario. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL RESEARCH. - ISSN 0304-4130. - 2019, 58:1(2019), pp. 341-361. [10.1111/1475-6765.12284]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1475-6765.12284.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 1.43 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.43 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Manuscript - EJPR-2017-0267-R2 - FINAL.pdf

Open Access dal 01/03/2021

Tipologia: Post-print referato (Refereed author’s manuscript)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 1.22 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.22 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/232301
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 40
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 36
social impact