This communication examines the best–worst method for multi-criteria decision making from a more mathematical perspective. The central part of this manuscript is the introduction of a new metric into the framework of the best–worst method. This alternative metric does not change the original idea behind the best–worst method and yet it can be shown that it is not only mathematically more sound but also that it ultimately leads to an optimization problem which can be simply linearized and thus solved.

A multiplicative best–worst method for multi-criteria decision making / Brunelli, M., Rezaei, J.. - In: OPERATIONS RESEARCH LETTERS. - ISSN 0167-6377. - 47:1(2019), pp. 12-15. [10.1016/j.orl.2018.11.008]

A multiplicative best–worst method for multi-criteria decision making

Brunelli, M;
2019-01-01

Abstract

This communication examines the best–worst method for multi-criteria decision making from a more mathematical perspective. The central part of this manuscript is the introduction of a new metric into the framework of the best–worst method. This alternative metric does not change the original idea behind the best–worst method and yet it can be shown that it is not only mathematically more sound but also that it ultimately leads to an optimization problem which can be simply linearized and thus solved.
2019
1
Brunelli, M; Rezaei, J
A multiplicative best–worst method for multi-criteria decision making / Brunelli, M., Rezaei, J.. - In: OPERATIONS RESEARCH LETTERS. - ISSN 0167-6377. - 47:1(2019), pp. 12-15. [10.1016/j.orl.2018.11.008]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
A multiplicative best-worst method.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 309.48 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
309.48 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/226442
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 96
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 87
  • OpenAlex 101
social impact