Although we can observe noticeable progress in gender diversity on corporate boards, these boards remain far from gender balanced. Our paper builds on social identity theory to examine the impact of corporate elites – men and women who sit on multiple corporate boards – on board diversity. We extend the main argument of social identity theory concerning favouritism based on homophily by suggesting that boards with men with multiple appointments are unwilling to include female board members to protect the monopoly value generated by their elite status. The empirical analysis, based on DAX 30 firms in the period of 2010-2015, shows that the presence of multi-board men is negatively associated with women’s participation, while the presence of multi-board women and other women on management boards is positively related to gender diversity on boards. Furthermore, robustness tests support and confirm our conclusion that multi- board men have a significant association with board diversity, even with small size (i.e., 1 or 2). Additionally, we find a significant effect arising from pressure related to the introduction of gender quotas in Germany, effective in 2016, indicating the effectiveness of gender quota policies for board gender diversity.

The influence of corporate elites on women on supervisory boards: Female directors’ inclusion in Germany / Jie, Huang; Marjo-Riitta, Diehl; Paterlini, Sandra. - In: JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS. - ISSN 0167-4544. - 165:2(2020), pp. 347-364. [10.1007/s10551-019-04119-6]

The influence of corporate elites on women on supervisory boards: Female directors’ inclusion in Germany

Sandra Paterlini
2020-01-01

Abstract

Although we can observe noticeable progress in gender diversity on corporate boards, these boards remain far from gender balanced. Our paper builds on social identity theory to examine the impact of corporate elites – men and women who sit on multiple corporate boards – on board diversity. We extend the main argument of social identity theory concerning favouritism based on homophily by suggesting that boards with men with multiple appointments are unwilling to include female board members to protect the monopoly value generated by their elite status. The empirical analysis, based on DAX 30 firms in the period of 2010-2015, shows that the presence of multi-board men is negatively associated with women’s participation, while the presence of multi-board women and other women on management boards is positively related to gender diversity on boards. Furthermore, robustness tests support and confirm our conclusion that multi- board men have a significant association with board diversity, even with small size (i.e., 1 or 2). Additionally, we find a significant effect arising from pressure related to the introduction of gender quotas in Germany, effective in 2016, indicating the effectiveness of gender quota policies for board gender diversity.
2020
2
Jie, Huang; Marjo-Riitta, Diehl; Paterlini, Sandra
The influence of corporate elites on women on supervisory boards: Female directors’ inclusion in Germany / Jie, Huang; Marjo-Riitta, Diehl; Paterlini, Sandra. - In: JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS. - ISSN 0167-4544. - 165:2(2020), pp. 347-364. [10.1007/s10551-019-04119-6]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
The_influence_of_corporate_elites_on_women_edited_final.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Post-print referato (Refereed author’s manuscript)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 704.27 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
704.27 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
s10551-019-04119-6.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 776.44 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
776.44 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/225472
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 34
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 21
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact