Protected areas are crucial for biodiversity conservation and the provision of ecosystem services (ES), but management efforts seem not to be sufficient. To increase management effectiveness, the ES framework offers new promising environmental governance instruments, however, the operational use is still poorly integrated in the management of protected areas. This study used a framework designed for Natura 2000 sites for effective management of protected areas by valorising ES. This framework was applied to 21 study sites in Italy, and 55 ES were quantified in biophysical and monetary terms. Forty-one payments for ecosystem services (PES) were implemented in a participatory process involving local communities and stakeholders. Assessment of the management effectiveness before and after the implementation of PES demonstrated that integrating ES into the management of protected areas can improve their management effectiveness and contribute to regional development through PES. Based on the authors’ experiences, the study highlights various difficulties and opportunities related to ES assessment, implementation of PES, stakeholder engagement, and monitoring of management effectiveness. It also discusses general challenges related to the operationalisation of ES in protected areas, providing recommendations for science and practice.

Operationalising ecosystem services for effective management of protected areas: Experiences and challenges / Schirpke, Uta; Marino, Davide; Marucci, Angelo; Palmieri, Margherita; Scolozzi, Rocco. - In: ECOSYSTEM SERVICES. - ISSN 2212-0416. - 28:(2017), pp. 105-114. [10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.009]

Operationalising ecosystem services for effective management of protected areas: Experiences and challenges

Scolozzi, Rocco
2017

Abstract

Protected areas are crucial for biodiversity conservation and the provision of ecosystem services (ES), but management efforts seem not to be sufficient. To increase management effectiveness, the ES framework offers new promising environmental governance instruments, however, the operational use is still poorly integrated in the management of protected areas. This study used a framework designed for Natura 2000 sites for effective management of protected areas by valorising ES. This framework was applied to 21 study sites in Italy, and 55 ES were quantified in biophysical and monetary terms. Forty-one payments for ecosystem services (PES) were implemented in a participatory process involving local communities and stakeholders. Assessment of the management effectiveness before and after the implementation of PES demonstrated that integrating ES into the management of protected areas can improve their management effectiveness and contribute to regional development through PES. Based on the authors’ experiences, the study highlights various difficulties and opportunities related to ES assessment, implementation of PES, stakeholder engagement, and monitoring of management effectiveness. It also discusses general challenges related to the operationalisation of ES in protected areas, providing recommendations for science and practice.
Schirpke, Uta; Marino, Davide; Marucci, Angelo; Palmieri, Margherita; Scolozzi, Rocco
Operationalising ecosystem services for effective management of protected areas: Experiences and challenges / Schirpke, Uta; Marino, Davide; Marucci, Angelo; Palmieri, Margherita; Scolozzi, Rocco. - In: ECOSYSTEM SERVICES. - ISSN 2212-0416. - 28:(2017), pp. 105-114. [10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.009]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2017 Operationalising ecosystem services for effective management of protected areas.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 1.33 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.33 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11572/205562
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 25
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 20
social impact