Sustainable water basin management requires characterization of flow regime in river networks impacted by anthropogenic pressures. Flow regime in ungauged catchments under current, future, or natural conditions can be assessed with hydrological models. Developing hydrological models is, however, resource demanding such that decision makers might revert tomodels that have been developed for other purposes and are made available to them (‘off-the-shelf’ models). In this study, the impact of epistemic uncertainty of flow regime indicators on flow-ecological assessment was assessed at selected stations with drainage areas ranging from about 400 to almost 90,000 km2 in four South European basins (Adige, Ebro, Evrotas and Sava). For each basin, at least two models were employed. Models differed in structure, data input, spatio-temporal resolution, and calibration strategy, reflecting the variety of conditions and purposes for which they were initially developed. The uncertainty of modelled flow regime was assessed by comparing the modelled hydrologic indicators of magnitude, timing, duration, frequency and rate of change to those obtained from observed flow. The results showed that modelled flow magnitude indicators at medium and high flows were generally reliable, whereas indicators for flow timing, duration, and rate of change were affected by large uncertainties, with correlation coefficients mostly below0.50. These findings mirror uncertainty in flow regime indicators assessed with othermethods, including frommeasured streamflow. The large indicator uncertaintymay significantly affect assessment of ecological status in freshwater systems, particularly in ungauged catchments. Finally, flow-ecological assessments proved very sensitive to reference flow regime (i.e., without anthropogenic pressures). Model simulations could not adequately capture flow regime in the reference sites comprised in this study. The lack of reliable reference conditionsmay seriously hamper flow-ecological assessments. This study shows the pressing need for improving assessment of natural flow regime at pan-European scale.

Uncertainty of modelled flow regime for flow-ecological assessment in Southern Europe / Vigiak, Olga; Lutz, Stefanie; Mentzafou, Angeliki; Chiogna, Gabriele; Tuo, Ye; Majone, Bruno; Beck, Hylke; de Roo, A.; Malagò, Anna; Bouraoui, F.; Kumar, Rohini; Samaniego, Luis; Merz, Ralf; Gamvroudis, Christos; Skoulikidis, Nikolaos; Nikolaidis, Nikolaos P.; Bellin, Alberto; Acuna, Vicenc; Mori, N.; Ludwig, Ralf; Pistocchi, Alberto. - In: SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT. - ISSN 0048-9697. - 615:(2018), pp. 1028-1047. [10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.295]

Uncertainty of modelled flow regime for flow-ecological assessment in Southern Europe

Chiogna, Gabriele;Majone, Bruno;Bellin, Alberto;Pistocchi, Alberto
2018-01-01

Abstract

Sustainable water basin management requires characterization of flow regime in river networks impacted by anthropogenic pressures. Flow regime in ungauged catchments under current, future, or natural conditions can be assessed with hydrological models. Developing hydrological models is, however, resource demanding such that decision makers might revert tomodels that have been developed for other purposes and are made available to them (‘off-the-shelf’ models). In this study, the impact of epistemic uncertainty of flow regime indicators on flow-ecological assessment was assessed at selected stations with drainage areas ranging from about 400 to almost 90,000 km2 in four South European basins (Adige, Ebro, Evrotas and Sava). For each basin, at least two models were employed. Models differed in structure, data input, spatio-temporal resolution, and calibration strategy, reflecting the variety of conditions and purposes for which they were initially developed. The uncertainty of modelled flow regime was assessed by comparing the modelled hydrologic indicators of magnitude, timing, duration, frequency and rate of change to those obtained from observed flow. The results showed that modelled flow magnitude indicators at medium and high flows were generally reliable, whereas indicators for flow timing, duration, and rate of change were affected by large uncertainties, with correlation coefficients mostly below0.50. These findings mirror uncertainty in flow regime indicators assessed with othermethods, including frommeasured streamflow. The large indicator uncertaintymay significantly affect assessment of ecological status in freshwater systems, particularly in ungauged catchments. Finally, flow-ecological assessments proved very sensitive to reference flow regime (i.e., without anthropogenic pressures). Model simulations could not adequately capture flow regime in the reference sites comprised in this study. The lack of reliable reference conditionsmay seriously hamper flow-ecological assessments. This study shows the pressing need for improving assessment of natural flow regime at pan-European scale.
2018
Vigiak, Olga; Lutz, Stefanie; Mentzafou, Angeliki; Chiogna, Gabriele; Tuo, Ye; Majone, Bruno; Beck, Hylke; de Roo, A.; Malagò, Anna; Bouraoui, F.; Kum...espandi
Uncertainty of modelled flow regime for flow-ecological assessment in Southern Europe / Vigiak, Olga; Lutz, Stefanie; Mentzafou, Angeliki; Chiogna, Gabriele; Tuo, Ye; Majone, Bruno; Beck, Hylke; de Roo, A.; Malagò, Anna; Bouraoui, F.; Kumar, Rohini; Samaniego, Luis; Merz, Ralf; Gamvroudis, Christos; Skoulikidis, Nikolaos; Nikolaidis, Nikolaos P.; Bellin, Alberto; Acuna, Vicenc; Mori, N.; Ludwig, Ralf; Pistocchi, Alberto. - In: SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT. - ISSN 0048-9697. - 615:(2018), pp. 1028-1047. [10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.295]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Vigiak_et_al_2018_STOTEN.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.15 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.15 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/195732
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 35
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 32
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact