Index tracking aims at replicating a given benchmark with a smaller number of its constituents. Different quantitative models can be set up to determine the optimal index replicating port- folio. In this paper, we propose an alternative based on imposing a constraint on the q-norm (0 < q < 1) of the replicating portfolios’ asset weights: the q-norm constraint regularises the problem and identifies a sparse model. Both approaches are challenging from an optimisation viewpoint due to either the presence of the cardinality constraint or a non-convex constraint on the q-norm. The problem can become even more complex when non-convex distance mea- sures or other real-world constraints are considered. We employ a hybrid heuristic as a flexible tool to tackle both optimisation problems. The empirical analysis on real-world financial data allows to compare the two index tracking approaches. Moreover, we propose a strategy to determine the optimal number of constituents and the corresponding optimal portfolio asset weights.

Cardinality versus q-Norm Constraints for Index Tracking, / Fastrich, B.; Paterlini, S.; Winker, P.. - In: QUANTITATIVE FINANCE. - ISSN 1469-7696. - 2014, 14 (11):(2014), pp. 1-14. [10.1080/14697688.2012.691986]

Cardinality versus q-Norm Constraints for Index Tracking,

S. Paterlini;
2014-01-01

Abstract

Index tracking aims at replicating a given benchmark with a smaller number of its constituents. Different quantitative models can be set up to determine the optimal index replicating port- folio. In this paper, we propose an alternative based on imposing a constraint on the q-norm (0 < q < 1) of the replicating portfolios’ asset weights: the q-norm constraint regularises the problem and identifies a sparse model. Both approaches are challenging from an optimisation viewpoint due to either the presence of the cardinality constraint or a non-convex constraint on the q-norm. The problem can become even more complex when non-convex distance mea- sures or other real-world constraints are considered. We employ a hybrid heuristic as a flexible tool to tackle both optimisation problems. The empirical analysis on real-world financial data allows to compare the two index tracking approaches. Moreover, we propose a strategy to determine the optimal number of constituents and the corresponding optimal portfolio asset weights.
2014
Fastrich, B.; Paterlini, S.; Winker, P.
Cardinality versus q-Norm Constraints for Index Tracking, / Fastrich, B.; Paterlini, S.; Winker, P.. - In: QUANTITATIVE FINANCE. - ISSN 1469-7696. - 2014, 14 (11):(2014), pp. 1-14. [10.1080/14697688.2012.691986]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/192904
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 40
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 38
social impact