The selection and ordering of response units (phonemes, letters, keystrokes) represents a transversal issue across different modalities of language production. Here, the issue of serial order was investigated with respect to typewriting. Following seminal investigations in the spoken modality, we conducted an experiment where participants typed as many times as possible a pair of words during a fixed time-window. The 2 words shared either their first 2 keystrokes, the last 2 ones, all the keystrokes, or were unrelated. Fine-grained performance measures were recorded at the level of individual keystrokes. In contrast with previous results from the spoken modality, we observed an overall facilitation for words sharing the initial keystrokes. In addition, the initial overlap briefly delayed the execution of the following keystroke. The results are discussed with reference to different theoretical perspectives on serial order, with a particular attention to the competing accounts offered by position coding models and chaining models. Our findings point to potential major differences between the speaking and typing modalities in terms of interactive activation between lexical and response units processing levels.

The serial order of response units in word production: the case of typing / Scaltritti, Michele; Longcamp, Marieke; Alario, F. -xavier. - In: JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION. - ISSN 0278-7393. - STAMPA. - 2018:(2018), pp. 819-825. [10.1037/xlm0000494]

The serial order of response units in word production: the case of typing

Scaltritti, Michele;
2018-01-01

Abstract

The selection and ordering of response units (phonemes, letters, keystrokes) represents a transversal issue across different modalities of language production. Here, the issue of serial order was investigated with respect to typewriting. Following seminal investigations in the spoken modality, we conducted an experiment where participants typed as many times as possible a pair of words during a fixed time-window. The 2 words shared either their first 2 keystrokes, the last 2 ones, all the keystrokes, or were unrelated. Fine-grained performance measures were recorded at the level of individual keystrokes. In contrast with previous results from the spoken modality, we observed an overall facilitation for words sharing the initial keystrokes. In addition, the initial overlap briefly delayed the execution of the following keystroke. The results are discussed with reference to different theoretical perspectives on serial order, with a particular attention to the competing accounts offered by position coding models and chaining models. Our findings point to potential major differences between the speaking and typing modalities in terms of interactive activation between lexical and response units processing levels.
2018
Scaltritti, Michele; Longcamp, Marieke; Alario, F. -xavier
The serial order of response units in word production: the case of typing / Scaltritti, Michele; Longcamp, Marieke; Alario, F. -xavier. - In: JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION. - ISSN 0278-7393. - STAMPA. - 2018:(2018), pp. 819-825. [10.1037/xlm0000494]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
The Serial Order of Keystrokes in Typing.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo principale post-print dell'autore
Tipologia: Post-print referato (Refereed author’s manuscript)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 4.12 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.12 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Scaltritti et al JEPLMC 2018.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 397.51 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
397.51 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/187725
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact