With no formal division between majority and opposition in the parliamentary arena, the European Union (EU) calls for an approach to political opposition which considers the role of civil society. This article explores the case of opposition to the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) within and without the European Parliament (EP) through a political opportunity approach, using the case to reflect on conditions for effective opposition in the EU. The ACTA campaign saw opposed actors within the EP and digital rights groups work together to build coalitions against the agreement. Protests then opened the way for these groups to broker a change of position among other actors, allowing a majority rejection. The ACTA case suggests the need for advocacy by organised groups both within and without the Parliament to construct majorities. Comparisons to similarly successful campaigns bolster this view, as do examples of less effective opposition.

The connection between parliamentary and extra-parliamentary opposition in the EU: From ACTA to the financial crisis / Crespy, Amandine; Parks, Louisa Rosemary. - In: JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION. - ISSN 1477-2280. - 2017, 39:4(2017), pp. 453-467. [10.1080/07036337.2017.1309038]

The connection between parliamentary and extra-parliamentary opposition in the EU: From ACTA to the financial crisis

Parks, Louisa Rosemary
2017-01-01

Abstract

With no formal division between majority and opposition in the parliamentary arena, the European Union (EU) calls for an approach to political opposition which considers the role of civil society. This article explores the case of opposition to the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) within and without the European Parliament (EP) through a political opportunity approach, using the case to reflect on conditions for effective opposition in the EU. The ACTA campaign saw opposed actors within the EP and digital rights groups work together to build coalitions against the agreement. Protests then opened the way for these groups to broker a change of position among other actors, allowing a majority rejection. The ACTA case suggests the need for advocacy by organised groups both within and without the Parliament to construct majorities. Comparisons to similarly successful campaigns bolster this view, as do examples of less effective opposition.
2017
4
Crespy, Amandine; Parks, Louisa Rosemary
The connection between parliamentary and extra-parliamentary opposition in the EU: From ACTA to the financial crisis / Crespy, Amandine; Parks, Louisa Rosemary. - In: JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION. - ISSN 1477-2280. - 2017, 39:4(2017), pp. 453-467. [10.1080/07036337.2017.1309038]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Crespy Parks JoEI final pre-print.pdf

Open Access dal 31/07/2018

Descrizione: Final edited version pre-publishing
Tipologia: Post-print referato (Refereed author’s manuscript)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 179.88 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
179.88 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Crespy & Parks_Opposition in the EU_as published in JoEI.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 1.08 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.08 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/185357
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 16
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 9
social impact