The present study investigates the consequences of respectful versus disrespectful communication in political debates on voters’ social judgments and voting decisions. Reconciling previously mixed results, we argue that the consequences of disrespect vary with the judgment dimension (communion vs. agency) and voters’ moral identity. An initial study (N = 197) finds that a political candidate's disrespect towards his or her opponent affects voting decision through voting intention. A second study (N = 327) shows that disrespect influences voting intention through communion but not through agency ratings. Qualifying the previous finding, a third study (N = 329) shows that both communion and agency judgments act as mediators, but in different ways depending on the level of moral identity. Overall, communion judgments played a more prominent part in explaining the consequences of disrespectful communication. Our findings thus present a nuanced picture of respect and disrespect in political communication and shed light on their ramifications.

Consequences of politicians’ disrespectful communication depend on social judgment dimensions and voters’ moral identity / Mölders, Christine; Quaquebeke, Van Niels; Paladino, Maria Paola. - In: POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY. - ISSN 1467-9221. - STAMPA. - 38:38(2017), pp. 119-135. [10.1111/pops.12311]

Consequences of politicians’ disrespectful communication depend on social judgment dimensions and voters’ moral identity.

Paladino, Maria Paola
2017-01-01

Abstract

The present study investigates the consequences of respectful versus disrespectful communication in political debates on voters’ social judgments and voting decisions. Reconciling previously mixed results, we argue that the consequences of disrespect vary with the judgment dimension (communion vs. agency) and voters’ moral identity. An initial study (N = 197) finds that a political candidate's disrespect towards his or her opponent affects voting decision through voting intention. A second study (N = 327) shows that disrespect influences voting intention through communion but not through agency ratings. Qualifying the previous finding, a third study (N = 329) shows that both communion and agency judgments act as mediators, but in different ways depending on the level of moral identity. Overall, communion judgments played a more prominent part in explaining the consequences of disrespectful communication. Our findings thus present a nuanced picture of respect and disrespect in political communication and shed light on their ramifications.
2017
38
Mölders, Christine; Quaquebeke, Van Niels; Paladino, Maria Paola
Consequences of politicians’ disrespectful communication depend on social judgment dimensions and voters’ moral identity / Mölders, Christine; Quaquebeke, Van Niels; Paladino, Maria Paola. - In: POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY. - ISSN 1467-9221. - STAMPA. - 38:38(2017), pp. 119-135. [10.1111/pops.12311]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Mölders, Christina; Van Quaquebeke, Niels; Paladino, Maria Paola_Consequences of Politicians Disrespectful Communication_Political Psychology_in press.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: articolo
Tipologia: Post-print referato (Refereed author’s manuscript)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 726.61 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
726.61 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/174235
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 16
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 11
social impact