The aim of the present study was to investigate the impact of dynamic distractors on the time-course of oculomotor selection using saccade trajectory deviations. Participants were instructed to make a speeded eye movement (pro-saccade) to a target presented above or below the fixation point while an irrelevant distractor was presented. Four types of distractors were varied within participants: (1) static, (2) flicker, (3) rotating apparent motion and (4) continuous motion. The eccentricity of the distractor was varied between participants. The results showed that saccadic trajectories curved towards distractors presented near the vertical midline; no reliable deviation was found for distractors presented further away from the vertical midline. Differences between the flickering and rotating distractor were found when distractor eccentricity was small and these specific effects developed over time such that there was a clear differentiation between saccadic deviation based on apparent motion for long-latency saccades, but not short-latency saccades. The present results suggest that the influence on performance of apparent motion stimuli is relatively delayed and acts in a more sustained manner compared to the influence of salient static, flickering and continuous moving stimuli.

The oculomotor salience of flicker, apparent motion and continuous motion in saccade trajectories / Van Zoest, Louise Johanna Francisca Maria; Heimler, Benedetta; Pavani, Francesco. - In: EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH. - ISSN 0014-4819. - 235:1(2017), pp. 181-191. [10.1007/s00221-016-4779-1]

The oculomotor salience of flicker, apparent motion and continuous motion in saccade trajectories

Van Zoest, Louise Johanna Francisca Maria;Heimler, Benedetta;Pavani, Francesco
2017-01-01

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate the impact of dynamic distractors on the time-course of oculomotor selection using saccade trajectory deviations. Participants were instructed to make a speeded eye movement (pro-saccade) to a target presented above or below the fixation point while an irrelevant distractor was presented. Four types of distractors were varied within participants: (1) static, (2) flicker, (3) rotating apparent motion and (4) continuous motion. The eccentricity of the distractor was varied between participants. The results showed that saccadic trajectories curved towards distractors presented near the vertical midline; no reliable deviation was found for distractors presented further away from the vertical midline. Differences between the flickering and rotating distractor were found when distractor eccentricity was small and these specific effects developed over time such that there was a clear differentiation between saccadic deviation based on apparent motion for long-latency saccades, but not short-latency saccades. The present results suggest that the influence on performance of apparent motion stimuli is relatively delayed and acts in a more sustained manner compared to the influence of salient static, flickering and continuous moving stimuli.
2017
1
Van Zoest, Louise Johanna Francisca Maria; Heimler, Benedetta; Pavani, Francesco
The oculomotor salience of flicker, apparent motion and continuous motion in saccade trajectories / Van Zoest, Louise Johanna Francisca Maria; Heimler, Benedetta; Pavani, Francesco. - In: EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH. - ISSN 0014-4819. - 235:1(2017), pp. 181-191. [10.1007/s00221-016-4779-1]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
van Zoest et al., 2017.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 611.12 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
611.12 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/173893
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact