Process-based hydrological models have a long history dating back to the 1960s. Criticized by some as over-parameterized, overly complex, and difficult to use, a more nuanced view is that these tools are nec- essary in many situations and, in a certain class of problems, they are the most appropriate type of hydro- logical model. This is especially the case in situations where knowledge of flow paths or distributed state variables and/or preservation of physical constraints is important. Examples of this include: spatiotem- poral variability of soil moisture, groundwater flow and runoff generation, sediment and contaminant transport, or when feedbacks among various Earth’s system processes or understanding the impacts of climate non-stationarity are of primary concern. These are situations where process-based models excel and other models are unverifiable. This article presents this pragmatic view in the context of existing literature to justify the approach where applicable and necessary. We review how improvements in data availability, computational resources and algorithms have made detailed hydrological simulations a real- ity. Avenues for the future of process-based hydrological models are presented suggesting their use as virtual laboratories, for design purposes, and with a powerful treatment of uncertainty.
An overview of current applications, challenges, and future trends in distributed process-based models in hydrology / Fatichi, S.; Vivoni, E. R.; Ogden, F. L.; Ivanov, V. Y; Mirus, B; Gochis, D.; Downer, C. W.; Camporese, M.; Davison, J. H.; Ebel, B.; Jones, N.; Kim, J.; Mascaro, G.; Niswonger, R.; Restrepo, P.; Rigon, Riccardo; Shen, C; Sulis, M.; Tarboton, D.. - In: JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY. - ISSN 0022-1694. - 2016:537(2016), pp. 45-60. [10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.03.026]
An overview of current applications, challenges, and future trends in distributed process-based models in hydrology
Rigon, Riccardo;
2016-01-01
Abstract
Process-based hydrological models have a long history dating back to the 1960s. Criticized by some as over-parameterized, overly complex, and difficult to use, a more nuanced view is that these tools are nec- essary in many situations and, in a certain class of problems, they are the most appropriate type of hydro- logical model. This is especially the case in situations where knowledge of flow paths or distributed state variables and/or preservation of physical constraints is important. Examples of this include: spatiotem- poral variability of soil moisture, groundwater flow and runoff generation, sediment and contaminant transport, or when feedbacks among various Earth’s system processes or understanding the impacts of climate non-stationarity are of primary concern. These are situations where process-based models excel and other models are unverifiable. This article presents this pragmatic view in the context of existing literature to justify the approach where applicable and necessary. We review how improvements in data availability, computational resources and algorithms have made detailed hydrological simulations a real- ity. Avenues for the future of process-based hydrological models are presented suggesting their use as virtual laboratories, for design purposes, and with a powerful treatment of uncertainty.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
J49-ProcessBasedModelling.pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
2.15 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.15 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
An overview of current applications.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Pre-print non referato (Non-refereed preprint)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
886.31 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
886.31 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione