OBJECTIVE: The goals of this work are to report data regarding a large number of stimulation sessions and to use model analyses to explain the similarities or differences in the sensations induced by different parameters of tES application. METHODS: We analysed sensation data relative to 693 different tES sessions. In particular, we studied the effects on sensations induced by different types of current, categories of polarity and frequency, different timing, levels of current density and intensity, different electrode sizes and different electrode locations (areas). RESULTS: The application of random or fixed alternating current stimulation (i.e., tRNS and tACS) over the scalp induced less sensation compared with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), regardless of the application parameters. Moreover, anodal tDCS induced more annoyance in comparison to other tES. Additionally, larger electrodes induced stronger sensations compared with smaller electrodes, and higher intensities were more strongly perceived. Timing of stimulation, montage and current density did not influence sensations perception. The analyses demonstrated that the induced sensations could be clustered on the basis of the type of somatosensory system activated. Finally and most important no adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Induced sensations are modulated by electrode size and intensity and mainly pertain to the cutaneous receptor activity of the somatosensory system. Moreover, the procedure currently used to perform placebo stimulation may not be totally effective when compared with anodal tDCS. SIGNIFICANCE: The reported observations enrich the literature regarding the safety aspects of tES, confirming that it is a painless and safe technique

What do you feel if I apply transcranial electric stimulation? Safety, sensations and secondary induced effects / Fertonani, A; Ferrari, C; Miniussi, Carlo. - In: CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY. - ISSN 1388-2457. - 2015, 126:-(2015), pp. 2181-2188. [10.1016/j.clinph.2015.03.015]

What do you feel if I apply transcranial electric stimulation? Safety, sensations and secondary induced effects

Miniussi, Carlo
2015-01-01

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The goals of this work are to report data regarding a large number of stimulation sessions and to use model analyses to explain the similarities or differences in the sensations induced by different parameters of tES application. METHODS: We analysed sensation data relative to 693 different tES sessions. In particular, we studied the effects on sensations induced by different types of current, categories of polarity and frequency, different timing, levels of current density and intensity, different electrode sizes and different electrode locations (areas). RESULTS: The application of random or fixed alternating current stimulation (i.e., tRNS and tACS) over the scalp induced less sensation compared with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), regardless of the application parameters. Moreover, anodal tDCS induced more annoyance in comparison to other tES. Additionally, larger electrodes induced stronger sensations compared with smaller electrodes, and higher intensities were more strongly perceived. Timing of stimulation, montage and current density did not influence sensations perception. The analyses demonstrated that the induced sensations could be clustered on the basis of the type of somatosensory system activated. Finally and most important no adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Induced sensations are modulated by electrode size and intensity and mainly pertain to the cutaneous receptor activity of the somatosensory system. Moreover, the procedure currently used to perform placebo stimulation may not be totally effective when compared with anodal tDCS. SIGNIFICANCE: The reported observations enrich the literature regarding the safety aspects of tES, confirming that it is a painless and safe technique
2015
-
Fertonani, A; Ferrari, C; Miniussi, Carlo
What do you feel if I apply transcranial electric stimulation? Safety, sensations and secondary induced effects / Fertonani, A; Ferrari, C; Miniussi, Carlo. - In: CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY. - ISSN 1388-2457. - 2015, 126:-(2015), pp. 2181-2188. [10.1016/j.clinph.2015.03.015]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Clin-N_Fertonani et al_15.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 408.07 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
408.07 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Fertonani et al CLINP_2015.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Post-print referato (Refereed author’s manuscript)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 353.54 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
353.54 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/145655
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 143
  • Scopus 283
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 261
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact