The principal aim of the AE<(g) overbar>IS experiment at CERN is to measure the acceleration of antihydrogen due to Earth's gravitational field. This would be a test of the Weak Equivalence Principle, which states that all bodies fall with the same acceleration independently of their mass and composition. The effect of Earth's gravitational field on antimatter will be determined by measuring the deflection of the path of the antihydrogen from a straight line. The position of the antihydrogen will be found by detecting its annihilation on the surface of a silicon detector. The gravitational measurement in AE<(g) overbar>IS will be performed with a gravity module, which includes the silicon detector, an emulsion detector and a scintillating fibre time-of-flight detector. As the experiment attempts to determine the gravitational acceleration with a precision of 1%, a position resolution better than 10 mu m is required. Here we present the results of a study of antiproton annihilations in a 3D silicon pixel sensor and compare the results with a previous study using a monolithic active pixel sensor. This work is part of a larger study on different silicon sensor technologies needed for the development of a silicon position detector for the AE<(g) overbar>IS experiment. The 3D detector together with its readout electronics have been originally designed for the ATLAS detector at the LHC. The direct annihilation of low energy antiprotons (similar to 100 keV) takes place in the first few mu m of the silicon sensor and we show that the charged products of the annihilation can be detected with the same sensor. The present study also aims to understand the signature of an antiproton annihilation event in segmented silicon detectors and compares it with a GEANT4 simulation model. These results will be used to determine the geometrical and process parameters to be adopted by the silicon annihilation detector to be installed in AE<(g) overbar>IS.

Comparison of planar and 3d silicon pixel sensors used for detection of low energy antiprotons / Gligorova, A.; Aghion, S.; Belov, A. S.; Bonomi, G.; Braunig, P.; Bremer, J.; Brusa, Roberto Sennen; Cabaret, L.; Caccia, M.; Caravita, R.; Castelli, F.; Cerchiari, G.; Cialdi, S.; Comparat, D.; Consolati, G.; Derking, J. H.; Da Via, C.; Di Domizio, S.; Di Noto, L.; Doser, M.; Dudarev, A.; Ferragut, R.; Fontana, A.; Genova, P.; Giammarchi, M.; Gninenko, S. N.; Haider, S.; Holmestad, H.; Huse, T.; Jordan, E.; Kaltenbacher, T.; Kellerbauer, A.; Knecht, A.; Krasnicky, D.; Lagomarsino, V.; Lehner, S.; Magnani, A.; Malbrunot, C.; Mariazzi, S.; Matveev, V. A.; Moia, F.; Nellist, C.; Nebbia, G.; Nedelec, P.; Oberthaler, M.; Pacifico, N.; Petracek, V.; Prelz, F.; Prevedelli, M.; Riccardi, C.; Rohne, O.; Rotondi, A.; Sandaker, H.; Subieta Vasquez, M. A.; Spacek, M.; Testera, G.; Widmann, E.; Yzombard, P.; Zavatarelli, S.; Zmeskal, J.. - In: IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE. - ISSN 0018-9499. - STAMPA. - 61:6(2014), pp. 3747-3753. [10.1109/TNS.2014.2368591]

Comparison of planar and 3d silicon pixel sensors used for detection of low energy antiprotons

Brusa, Roberto Sennen;Mariazzi, S.;
2014-01-01

Abstract

The principal aim of the AE<(g) overbar>IS experiment at CERN is to measure the acceleration of antihydrogen due to Earth's gravitational field. This would be a test of the Weak Equivalence Principle, which states that all bodies fall with the same acceleration independently of their mass and composition. The effect of Earth's gravitational field on antimatter will be determined by measuring the deflection of the path of the antihydrogen from a straight line. The position of the antihydrogen will be found by detecting its annihilation on the surface of a silicon detector. The gravitational measurement in AE<(g) overbar>IS will be performed with a gravity module, which includes the silicon detector, an emulsion detector and a scintillating fibre time-of-flight detector. As the experiment attempts to determine the gravitational acceleration with a precision of 1%, a position resolution better than 10 mu m is required. Here we present the results of a study of antiproton annihilations in a 3D silicon pixel sensor and compare the results with a previous study using a monolithic active pixel sensor. This work is part of a larger study on different silicon sensor technologies needed for the development of a silicon position detector for the AE<(g) overbar>IS experiment. The 3D detector together with its readout electronics have been originally designed for the ATLAS detector at the LHC. The direct annihilation of low energy antiprotons (similar to 100 keV) takes place in the first few mu m of the silicon sensor and we show that the charged products of the annihilation can be detected with the same sensor. The present study also aims to understand the signature of an antiproton annihilation event in segmented silicon detectors and compares it with a GEANT4 simulation model. These results will be used to determine the geometrical and process parameters to be adopted by the silicon annihilation detector to be installed in AE<(g) overbar>IS.
2014
6
Gligorova, A.; Aghion, S.; Belov, A. S.; Bonomi, G.; Braunig, P.; Bremer, J.; Brusa, Roberto Sennen; Cabaret, L.; Caccia, M.; Caravita, R.; Castelli, F.; Cerchiari, G.; Cialdi, S.; Comparat, D.; Consolati, G.; Derking, J. H.; Da Via, C.; Di Domizio, S.; Di Noto, L.; Doser, M.; Dudarev, A.; Ferragut, R.; Fontana, A.; Genova, P.; Giammarchi, M.; Gninenko, S. N.; Haider, S.; Holmestad, H.; Huse, T.; Jordan, E.; Kaltenbacher, T.; Kellerbauer, A.; Knecht, A.; Krasnicky, D.; Lagomarsino, V.; Lehner, S.; Magnani, A.; Malbrunot, C.; Mariazzi, S.; Matveev, V. A.; Moia, F.; Nellist, C.; Nebbia, G.; Nedelec, P.; Oberthaler, M.; Pacifico, N.; Petracek, V.; Prelz, F.; Prevedelli, M.; Riccardi, C.; Rohne, O.; Rotondi, A.; Sandaker, H.; Subieta Vasquez, M. A.; Spacek, M.; Testera, G.; Widmann, E.; Yzombard, P.; Zavatarelli, S.; Zmeskal, J.
Comparison of planar and 3d silicon pixel sensors used for detection of low energy antiprotons / Gligorova, A.; Aghion, S.; Belov, A. S.; Bonomi, G.; Braunig, P.; Bremer, J.; Brusa, Roberto Sennen; Cabaret, L.; Caccia, M.; Caravita, R.; Castelli, F.; Cerchiari, G.; Cialdi, S.; Comparat, D.; Consolati, G.; Derking, J. H.; Da Via, C.; Di Domizio, S.; Di Noto, L.; Doser, M.; Dudarev, A.; Ferragut, R.; Fontana, A.; Genova, P.; Giammarchi, M.; Gninenko, S. N.; Haider, S.; Holmestad, H.; Huse, T.; Jordan, E.; Kaltenbacher, T.; Kellerbauer, A.; Knecht, A.; Krasnicky, D.; Lagomarsino, V.; Lehner, S.; Magnani, A.; Malbrunot, C.; Mariazzi, S.; Matveev, V. A.; Moia, F.; Nellist, C.; Nebbia, G.; Nedelec, P.; Oberthaler, M.; Pacifico, N.; Petracek, V.; Prelz, F.; Prevedelli, M.; Riccardi, C.; Rohne, O.; Rotondi, A.; Sandaker, H.; Subieta Vasquez, M. A.; Spacek, M.; Testera, G.; Widmann, E.; Yzombard, P.; Zavatarelli, S.; Zmeskal, J.. - In: IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE. - ISSN 0018-9499. - STAMPA. - 61:6(2014), pp. 3747-3753. [10.1109/TNS.2014.2368591]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
06971249.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 1.27 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.27 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/116967
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact