OBJECTIVE. The appropriateness of the 1-in-X numerical format to convey quantitative medical probabilities is currently under discussion because of its distortive effect on subjective probability assessment. Previous research, however, always asked participants to imagine a hypothetical scenario. The aim of the present research is to support the existence of the 1-in-X effect in a real setting: when pregnant women have to evaluate their personal risk of Down syndrome according to their maternal age. METHOD. During the first prenatal visit, pregnant women were asked to evaluate their own risk of having a child with Down syndrome according to their age, when such risk was presented either in the 1-in-X or in the N-in-NX format. Then, they were asked to assess their risk of having a child with Down syndrome. RESULTS. Results showed a systematic higher risk assessment when pregnant women were presented with the 1-in-X format (mean = 3.57, standard deviation = 1.4) than with the N-in-NX format (mean = 3.03, standard deviation = 1.4), P = 0.007. Whereas the effect was shown to be not moderated by a differential comprehension of the two numerical formats, women with a low educational level and those who were at their first pregnancy were shown to be significantly more vulnerable. CONCLUSION. The present findings corroborate the existence of the 1-in-X effect in a real-world setting, showing that, in pregnant women, the 1-in-X format actually elicits a higher perceived risk of Down syndrome, compared with the N-in-NX format. © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Communicating Down syndrome risk according to maternal age: "1-in-X" effect on perceived risk / Pighin, Stefania; Savadori, Lucia; Barilli, Elisa; Galbiati, Silvia; Smid, Maddalene; Ferrari, Maurizio; Cremonesi, Laura. - In: PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS. - ISSN 0197-3851. - 35:8(2015), pp. 777-782. [10.1002/pd.4606]
Communicating Down syndrome risk according to maternal age: "1-in-X" effect on perceived risk
Pighin, StefaniaPrimo
;Savadori, LuciaSecondo
;Barilli, Elisa;
2015-01-01
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The appropriateness of the 1-in-X numerical format to convey quantitative medical probabilities is currently under discussion because of its distortive effect on subjective probability assessment. Previous research, however, always asked participants to imagine a hypothetical scenario. The aim of the present research is to support the existence of the 1-in-X effect in a real setting: when pregnant women have to evaluate their personal risk of Down syndrome according to their maternal age. METHOD. During the first prenatal visit, pregnant women were asked to evaluate their own risk of having a child with Down syndrome according to their age, when such risk was presented either in the 1-in-X or in the N-in-NX format. Then, they were asked to assess their risk of having a child with Down syndrome. RESULTS. Results showed a systematic higher risk assessment when pregnant women were presented with the 1-in-X format (mean = 3.57, standard deviation = 1.4) than with the N-in-NX format (mean = 3.03, standard deviation = 1.4), P = 0.007. Whereas the effect was shown to be not moderated by a differential comprehension of the two numerical formats, women with a low educational level and those who were at their first pregnancy were shown to be significantly more vulnerable. CONCLUSION. The present findings corroborate the existence of the 1-in-X effect in a real-world setting, showing that, in pregnant women, the 1-in-X format actually elicits a higher perceived risk of Down syndrome, compared with the N-in-NX format. © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Pighin_et_al-2015-Prenatal_Diagnosis.pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
173.59 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
173.59 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione



