Evaluating and comparing different ontology matching techniques is a complex multifaceted problem. Currently, diverse golden standards and various practices are used for evaluations. In this paper we show that, by following certain rules, the quality of the evaluations can be significantly improved, particularly in regard to the accuracy of precision and recall measures obtained.

Recommendations for Better Quality Ontology Matching Evaluations / Autayeu, Aliaksandr; Maltese, Vincenzo; Andrews, Pierre Yves. - (2010). ((Intervento presentato al convegno 2nd AISB Workshop on Matching and Meaning tenutosi a Leicester nel 31 Marzo 2010.

Recommendations for Better Quality Ontology Matching Evaluations

Autayeu, Aliaksandr;Maltese, Vincenzo;Andrews, Pierre Yves
2010

Abstract

Evaluating and comparing different ontology matching techniques is a complex multifaceted problem. Currently, diverse golden standards and various practices are used for evaluations. In this paper we show that, by following certain rules, the quality of the evaluations can be significantly improved, particularly in regard to the accuracy of precision and recall measures obtained.
AISB
unknown
unknown
Autayeu, Aliaksandr; Maltese, Vincenzo; Andrews, Pierre Yves
Recommendations for Better Quality Ontology Matching Evaluations / Autayeu, Aliaksandr; Maltese, Vincenzo; Andrews, Pierre Yves. - (2010). ((Intervento presentato al convegno 2nd AISB Workshop on Matching and Meaning tenutosi a Leicester nel 31 Marzo 2010.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11572/105562
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact