OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prevalence of sarcopenia by applying European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) flow chart in an acute care geriatric unit as well as to test a modified version of the EWGSOP diagnostic algorithm combining handgrip and gait speed test to identify subjects with low muscle mass. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING: Geriatric unit in an academic medical department. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred nineteen acutely ill persons (34.4% female), with mean age 80.4 ± 6.9 years and body mass index 26.3 ± 4.9 kg/m(2). MEASUREMENTS: Assessment of muscle mass by bioimpedence analysis, muscle strength by handheld dynamometer, and gait speed with the 4-meter walking test. RESULTS: Using the EWGSOP classification for sarcopenia, 5.0% presented with sarcopenia and 21.0% with severe sarcopenia. Combining gait speed test and handgrip strength measurement, the highest predictive power in detecting subjects with low muscle mass was observed (sensitivity and specificity, 80.6% and 62.5%, respectively). Subjects presenting with both normal gait speed and handgrip showed normal values of muscle mass as assessed with bioimpedence analysis. By using the ROC method, when the 2 tests were combined, the AUC was statistically higher than when using each test separately (0.740; P = .018). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that 1 of 4 patients admitted to the acute care department were recognized to be sarcopenic. When a modifived version of the EWGSOP flow chart, obtained combining both gait speed and handgrip was used, sensitivity and specificity of algorithm to identify subjects with low muscle mass was improved.

Identifying sarcopenia in acute care setting patients

Micciolo, Rocco;Francesco Fantin
2014-01-01

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prevalence of sarcopenia by applying European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) flow chart in an acute care geriatric unit as well as to test a modified version of the EWGSOP diagnostic algorithm combining handgrip and gait speed test to identify subjects with low muscle mass. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING: Geriatric unit in an academic medical department. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred nineteen acutely ill persons (34.4% female), with mean age 80.4 ± 6.9 years and body mass index 26.3 ± 4.9 kg/m(2). MEASUREMENTS: Assessment of muscle mass by bioimpedence analysis, muscle strength by handheld dynamometer, and gait speed with the 4-meter walking test. RESULTS: Using the EWGSOP classification for sarcopenia, 5.0% presented with sarcopenia and 21.0% with severe sarcopenia. Combining gait speed test and handgrip strength measurement, the highest predictive power in detecting subjects with low muscle mass was observed (sensitivity and specificity, 80.6% and 62.5%, respectively). Subjects presenting with both normal gait speed and handgrip showed normal values of muscle mass as assessed with bioimpedence analysis. By using the ROC method, when the 2 tests were combined, the AUC was statistically higher than when using each test separately (0.740; P = .018). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that 1 of 4 patients admitted to the acute care department were recognized to be sarcopenic. When a modifived version of the EWGSOP flow chart, obtained combining both gait speed and handgrip was used, sensitivity and specificity of algorithm to identify subjects with low muscle mass was improved.
2014
4
Andrea P., Rossi; Francesco, Fantin; Micciolo, Rocco; Monica, Bertocchi; Paolo, Bertassello; Valeria, Zanandrea; Alessandra, Zivelonghi; Luisa, Bissoli; Mauro, Zamboni
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2014-Rossi-JAMDA.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 625.14 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
625.14 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/100940
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 30
  • Scopus 77
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 52
social impact