Evaluating communication networks traditionally requires costly simulations or physical testbeds. This work presents a closed-loop framework that combines a Large Language Model (LLM) for scenario generation, a Random Forest (RF) surrogate for rapid prediction of key performance indicators (KPI), and an NS-3 digital twin (DT) for validation.The LLM produces schema-constrained scenarios, the RF filters scenarios by predicted throughput, latency, and loss, and high-value cases are executed in the DT with results fed back to refine the RF model and guide subsequent exploration.Experiments demonstrate three outcomes: fidelity, with the digital twin consistently reproducing baseline KPIs across batches (e.g., Cubic-FQ-CoDel maintains 71.13±0.01 Mbps); robustness, with accurate capture of degradation and recovery under failures and identification of resilient protocol-queue combinations (NewReno-CoDel: 95%+ retention); and optimization, with Pareto analysis highlighting Westwood+RED for lowest latency ( 13 ms) and Cubic+RED as overall best (performance score: 23.48).The framework achieves near-perfect prediction accuracy (R2 ≈ 0.99), reduces simulation overhead, and offers interpretable insights for multi-objective optimization. These results position LLM-driven DTs as a practical tool for efficient, data-driven network experimentation.

LLM-Guided Digital Twin for Network Experimentation: Fidelity, Robustness, and Optimization / Ntassah, R., Shah, A., Granelli, F.. - (2026). (2026 IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC 2026 Glasgow, United Kingdom 24-28 May 2026) [10.1109/ICC59461.2026.11586822].

LLM-Guided Digital Twin for Network Experimentation: Fidelity, Robustness, and Optimization

Ntassah, Rawlings
Primo
;
Shah, Ayub
Secondo
;
Granelli, Fabrizio
Penultimo
2026-01-01

Abstract

Evaluating communication networks traditionally requires costly simulations or physical testbeds. This work presents a closed-loop framework that combines a Large Language Model (LLM) for scenario generation, a Random Forest (RF) surrogate for rapid prediction of key performance indicators (KPI), and an NS-3 digital twin (DT) for validation.The LLM produces schema-constrained scenarios, the RF filters scenarios by predicted throughput, latency, and loss, and high-value cases are executed in the DT with results fed back to refine the RF model and guide subsequent exploration.Experiments demonstrate three outcomes: fidelity, with the digital twin consistently reproducing baseline KPIs across batches (e.g., Cubic-FQ-CoDel maintains 71.13±0.01 Mbps); robustness, with accurate capture of degradation and recovery under failures and identification of resilient protocol-queue combinations (NewReno-CoDel: 95%+ retention); and optimization, with Pareto analysis highlighting Westwood+RED for lowest latency ( 13 ms) and Cubic+RED as overall best (performance score: 23.48).The framework achieves near-perfect prediction accuracy (R2 ≈ 0.99), reduces simulation overhead, and offers interpretable insights for multi-objective optimization. These results position LLM-driven DTs as a practical tool for efficient, data-driven network experimentation.
2026
LLM-Guided Digital Twin for Network Experimentation: Fidelity, Robustness, and Optimization
ICC 2026 - IEEE International Conference on Communications, Glasgow, United Kingdom
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
9798319542090
Ntassah, Rawlings; Shah, Ayub; Granelli, Fabrizio
LLM-Guided Digital Twin for Network Experimentation: Fidelity, Robustness, and Optimization / Ntassah, R., Shah, A., Granelli, F.. - (2026). (2026 IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC 2026 Glasgow, United Kingdom 24-28 May 2026) [10.1109/ICC59461.2026.11586822].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/495750
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex 0
social impact