Accurate indoor localization is a key enabler for Industry 4.0 and IoT applications, including asset tracking and human–machine interaction. Among available techniques, Angle-of-Arrival (AoA) estimation offers directional information with minimal infrastructure. This paper presents a comparative evaluation of two commercial AoA platforms: the Murata Type2AB module, based on UWB (Qorvo DW3000), and the u-blox XPLR-AOA-2 kit, which leverages Bluetooth 5.1 Direction Finding. Experiments were conducted in a motion-capture-equipped lab to provide ground-truth reference. The systems were tested at various distances and orientations, and evaluated in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, and robustness. The UWB platform achieved average angular errors below 4∘ with standard deviations under 5∘ across all conditions. The BLE system exhibited similar angular accuracy (mean error 4.7∘) within ±45∘, but degraded beyond that range, with errors exceeding 20∘ and variability up to 5∘.

A Comparative Evaluation of UWB and BLE AoA for Short-Range Indoor Localization / Nardello, Matteo; Marconi, Matteo; Brunelli, Davide. - 1553:(2026), pp. 255-260. ( International Conference on Applications in Electronics Pervading Industry, Environment and Society, APPLEPIES 2025 Turin, Italy September 11–12, 2025) [10.1007/978-3-032-17174-0_36].

A Comparative Evaluation of UWB and BLE AoA for Short-Range Indoor Localization

Nardello Matteo;Brunelli Davide
2026-01-01

Abstract

Accurate indoor localization is a key enabler for Industry 4.0 and IoT applications, including asset tracking and human–machine interaction. Among available techniques, Angle-of-Arrival (AoA) estimation offers directional information with minimal infrastructure. This paper presents a comparative evaluation of two commercial AoA platforms: the Murata Type2AB module, based on UWB (Qorvo DW3000), and the u-blox XPLR-AOA-2 kit, which leverages Bluetooth 5.1 Direction Finding. Experiments were conducted in a motion-capture-equipped lab to provide ground-truth reference. The systems were tested at various distances and orientations, and evaluated in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, and robustness. The UWB platform achieved average angular errors below 4∘ with standard deviations under 5∘ across all conditions. The BLE system exhibited similar angular accuracy (mean error 4.7∘) within ±45∘, but degraded beyond that range, with errors exceeding 20∘ and variability up to 5∘.
2026
Applications in Electronics Pervading Industry, Environment and Society APPLEPIES 2025 - Conference proceedings
Cham, Switzerland
Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
9783032171733
9783032171740
Settore ING-INF/01 - Elettronica
Settore ING-INF/05 - Sistemi di Elaborazione delle Informazioni
Settore IINF-01/A - Elettronica
Settore IINF-05/A - Sistemi di elaborazione delle informazioni
Nardello, Matteo; Marconi, Matteo; Brunelli, Davide
A Comparative Evaluation of UWB and BLE AoA for Short-Range Indoor Localization / Nardello, Matteo; Marconi, Matteo; Brunelli, Davide. - 1553:(2026), pp. 255-260. ( International Conference on Applications in Electronics Pervading Industry, Environment and Society, APPLEPIES 2025 Turin, Italy September 11–12, 2025) [10.1007/978-3-032-17174-0_36].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
_ApplePies25__UWBvsBLE_Indoor_Localization-1.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: ApplePies 2025 - conference paper
Tipologia: Post-print referato (Refereed author’s manuscript)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 239.4 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
239.4 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/484410
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact