Accurate indoor localization is a key enabler for Industry 4.0 and IoT applications, including asset tracking and human–machine interaction. Among available techniques, Angle-of-Arrival (AoA) estimation offers directional information with minimal infrastructure. This paper presents a comparative evaluation of two commercial AoA platforms: the Murata Type2AB module, based on UWB (Qorvo DW3000), and the u-blox XPLR-AOA-2 kit, which leverages Bluetooth 5.1 Direction Finding. Experiments were conducted in a motion-capture-equipped lab to provide ground-truth reference. The systems were tested at various distances and orientations, and evaluated in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, and robustness. The UWB platform achieved average angular errors below 4∘ with standard deviations under 5∘ across all conditions. The BLE system exhibited similar angular accuracy (mean error 4.7∘) within ±45∘, but degraded beyond that range, with errors exceeding 20∘ and variability up to 5∘.
A Comparative Evaluation of UWB and BLE AoA for Short-Range Indoor Localization / Nardello, Matteo; Marconi, Matteo; Brunelli, Davide. - 1553:(2026), pp. 255-260. ( International Conference on Applications in Electronics Pervading Industry, Environment and Society, APPLEPIES 2025 ita 2025) [10.1007/978-3-032-17174-0_36].
A Comparative Evaluation of UWB and BLE AoA for Short-Range Indoor Localization
Nardello Matteo;Brunelli Davide
2026-01-01
Abstract
Accurate indoor localization is a key enabler for Industry 4.0 and IoT applications, including asset tracking and human–machine interaction. Among available techniques, Angle-of-Arrival (AoA) estimation offers directional information with minimal infrastructure. This paper presents a comparative evaluation of two commercial AoA platforms: the Murata Type2AB module, based on UWB (Qorvo DW3000), and the u-blox XPLR-AOA-2 kit, which leverages Bluetooth 5.1 Direction Finding. Experiments were conducted in a motion-capture-equipped lab to provide ground-truth reference. The systems were tested at various distances and orientations, and evaluated in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, and robustness. The UWB platform achieved average angular errors below 4∘ with standard deviations under 5∘ across all conditions. The BLE system exhibited similar angular accuracy (mean error 4.7∘) within ±45∘, but degraded beyond that range, with errors exceeding 20∘ and variability up to 5∘.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione



