Quantum optimization has emerged as a promising approach for tackling complicated classical optimization problems using quantum devices. However, the extent to which such algorithms harness genuine quantum resources and the role of these resources in their success remain open questions. In this work, we investigate the resource requirements of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) through the lens of the resource theory of nonstabilizerness. We demonstrate that the nonstabilizerness in QAOA increases with circuit depth before it reaches a maximum, to fall again during the approach to the final solution state -- creating a barrier that limits the algorithm's capability for shallow circuits. We find curves corresponding to different depths to collapse under a simple rescaling, and we reveal a nontrivial relationship between the final nonstabilizerness and the success probability. Finally, we identify a similar nonstabilizerness barrier also in adiabatic quantum annealing. Our results provide deeper insights into how quantum resources influence quantum optimization.

Role of Nonstabilizerness in Quantum Optimization / Capecci, Chiara; Santra, Gopal Chandra; Bottarelli, Alberto; Tirrito, Emanuele; Hauke, Philipp. - ELETTRONICO. - 2025:(2025).

Role of Nonstabilizerness in Quantum Optimization

Chiara Capecci;Gopal Chandra Santra;Alberto Bottarelli;Emanuele Tirrito;Philipp Hauke
2025-01-01

Abstract

Quantum optimization has emerged as a promising approach for tackling complicated classical optimization problems using quantum devices. However, the extent to which such algorithms harness genuine quantum resources and the role of these resources in their success remain open questions. In this work, we investigate the resource requirements of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) through the lens of the resource theory of nonstabilizerness. We demonstrate that the nonstabilizerness in QAOA increases with circuit depth before it reaches a maximum, to fall again during the approach to the final solution state -- creating a barrier that limits the algorithm's capability for shallow circuits. We find curves corresponding to different depths to collapse under a simple rescaling, and we reveal a nontrivial relationship between the final nonstabilizerness and the success probability. Finally, we identify a similar nonstabilizerness barrier also in adiabatic quantum annealing. Our results provide deeper insights into how quantum resources influence quantum optimization.
2025
[S.l.
s.n.]
Role of Nonstabilizerness in Quantum Optimization / Capecci, Chiara; Santra, Gopal Chandra; Bottarelli, Alberto; Tirrito, Emanuele; Hauke, Philipp. - ELETTRONICO. - 2025:(2025).
Capecci, Chiara; Santra, Gopal Chandra; Bottarelli, Alberto; Tirrito, Emanuele; Hauke, Philipp
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2505.17185v2.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Role of Nonstabilizerness in Quantum Optimization
Tipologia: Pre-print non referato (Non-refereed preprint)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 2.47 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.47 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/478250
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact