In this paper, we present a preliminary ontology of bias based on the DOLCE foundational ontology. The main reason for devising such an endeavour is to make explicit the ontological assumptions behind the use of terms indicating the elements composing a biased outcome. Firstly, we discuss what the object of a bias is —namely, the entity that might be deemed biased, which we identify with situated inferences, i.e. propositional contents that can be asserted by some (human or artificial) agent from other propositional contents. We will thus categorise in DOLCE various types of biases as concepts that classify situated inferences. The content of such inferences is then associated with the following elements: i) the agent responsible for drawing the conclusion, ii) the objects and iii) the concepts used in the premises and in the conclusion of the inference, iv) the time when the inference takes place. These ingredients will serve to trace the origin of what we shall call a biased inference back to any of the above elements, relating some of the biases present in the literature to these ontologically founded elements.
Taming the Sea of Errors: An Ontological Study of Biases in DOLCE / Ferrario, Roberta; Porello, Daniele; Bottazzi, Emanuele; De Florio, Ciro; Fumagalli, Mattia. - 409:(2025), pp. 64-78. ( 15th Formal Ontology in Information Systems Conference, FOIS 2025 Catania (Italy) 10-12 September 2025 (preceded by a virtual conference online 4-5 September 2025)) [10.3233/faia250484].
Taming the Sea of Errors: An Ontological Study of Biases in DOLCE
Ferrario, Roberta;Porello, Daniele;Fumagalli, Mattia
2025-01-01
Abstract
In this paper, we present a preliminary ontology of bias based on the DOLCE foundational ontology. The main reason for devising such an endeavour is to make explicit the ontological assumptions behind the use of terms indicating the elements composing a biased outcome. Firstly, we discuss what the object of a bias is —namely, the entity that might be deemed biased, which we identify with situated inferences, i.e. propositional contents that can be asserted by some (human or artificial) agent from other propositional contents. We will thus categorise in DOLCE various types of biases as concepts that classify situated inferences. The content of such inferences is then associated with the following elements: i) the agent responsible for drawing the conclusion, ii) the objects and iii) the concepts used in the premises and in the conclusion of the inference, iv) the time when the inference takes place. These ingredients will serve to trace the origin of what we shall call a biased inference back to any of the above elements, relating some of the biases present in the literature to these ontologically founded elements.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
FerrarioEtAlFOIS2025.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
398.81 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
398.81 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione



