Large language models are increasingly used for teaching and self-learning foreign languages. However, their capability to meet specific linguistic constraints is still underexplored. This study compares the effectiveness of prompt engineering in guiding ChatGPT (4o and 4o-mini), and Llama 3 to rephrase general-domain texts to meet CEFR A1-level constraints in English and Italian, making them suitable for beginner learners. It compares 4 prompt engineering approaches, built upon iterative paraphrasing method that gradually refines original texts for CEFR compliance. The approaches compared include paraphrasing with or without Chain-of-Thought, as well as grammar and vocabulary simplification performed either simultaneously or as separate steps. The findings suggest that for English the best approach is combining COT with separate grammar and vocabulary simplification, while for Italian one-step strategies have better effect on grammar, and two-step strategies work better for covering the vocabulary. The paraphrasing approach can approve compliance, although at this point it is not cost-effective. We release a dataset of pairs original sentence-beginner level paraphrase (both in Italian and in English) on which further work could be based.

Exploring Paraphrasing Strategies for CEFR A1-Level Constraints in LLMs / Marzona, Eugenio; Goikhman, Mariia; Aprosio, Alessio Palmero; Zancanaro, Massimo. - (2025), pp. 15305-15318. ( EMNLP Suzhou, China 4-9 November 2025) [10.18653/v1/2025.findings-emnlp.828].

Exploring Paraphrasing Strategies for CEFR A1-Level Constraints in LLMs

Marzona, Eugenio;Goikhman, Mariia;Aprosio, Alessio Palmero
;
Zancanaro, Massimo
2025-01-01

Abstract

Large language models are increasingly used for teaching and self-learning foreign languages. However, their capability to meet specific linguistic constraints is still underexplored. This study compares the effectiveness of prompt engineering in guiding ChatGPT (4o and 4o-mini), and Llama 3 to rephrase general-domain texts to meet CEFR A1-level constraints in English and Italian, making them suitable for beginner learners. It compares 4 prompt engineering approaches, built upon iterative paraphrasing method that gradually refines original texts for CEFR compliance. The approaches compared include paraphrasing with or without Chain-of-Thought, as well as grammar and vocabulary simplification performed either simultaneously or as separate steps. The findings suggest that for English the best approach is combining COT with separate grammar and vocabulary simplification, while for Italian one-step strategies have better effect on grammar, and two-step strategies work better for covering the vocabulary. The paraphrasing approach can approve compliance, although at this point it is not cost-effective. We release a dataset of pairs original sentence-beginner level paraphrase (both in Italian and in English) on which further work could be based.
2025
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2025
Suzhou, China
ACL
Settore INF/01 - Informatica
Settore INFO-01/A - Informatica
Marzona, Eugenio; Goikhman, Mariia; Aprosio, Alessio Palmero; Zancanaro, Massimo
Exploring Paraphrasing Strategies for CEFR A1-Level Constraints in LLMs / Marzona, Eugenio; Goikhman, Mariia; Aprosio, Alessio Palmero; Zancanaro, Massimo. - (2025), pp. 15305-15318. ( EMNLP Suzhou, China 4-9 November 2025) [10.18653/v1/2025.findings-emnlp.828].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2025.findings-emnlp.828.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 216.28 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
216.28 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/467750
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact