The use of 3D printing (3DP) in biomedical applications, such as pre-operative planning, personalized medical devices and surgical implants, enhances procedural accuracy and reduces recovery times and costs. However, the lack of standardized quality control (QC) regulations for 3DP in healthcare presents challenges in ensuring consistency and reliability. This study aims to contribute to QC protocols by assessing the volume of six clavicle models 3D printed by Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) technology. Two different computed tomography (CT)-based measurement methods were employed. Data was acquired by a diagnostic CT (CT-D), scanner typically used in hospitals for medical imaging and already available at the point-of-care, and an industrial CT (CT-I) scanner, designed for high-precision metrological analysis. CT-I was assumed as the reference to quantify the accuracy and uncertainty of CT-D in the context of 3D printed anatomical models. From the comparison of the experimental results, a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 0.65% was found between CT-D and CT-I. Furthermore, a maximum volumetric discrepancy of 2% was observed between the bone replicas, suggesting that discrepancies exceeding this value could require a reassessment of the printing process.

Volumetric Assessment for Quality Control in 3D Printed Bone Models: a Preliminary Investigation / Cecchitelli, Marta; Fiori, Giorgia; Luchetti, Alessandro; Galo, Jan; Sciuto, Salvatore Andrea; Scorza, Andrea. - (2025), pp. 101-105. ( 8th IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 and IoT, MetroInd4.0 and IoT 2025 esp 2025) [10.1109/metroind4.0iot66048.2025.11122089].

Volumetric Assessment for Quality Control in 3D Printed Bone Models: a Preliminary Investigation

Luchetti, Alessandro;
2025-01-01

Abstract

The use of 3D printing (3DP) in biomedical applications, such as pre-operative planning, personalized medical devices and surgical implants, enhances procedural accuracy and reduces recovery times and costs. However, the lack of standardized quality control (QC) regulations for 3DP in healthcare presents challenges in ensuring consistency and reliability. This study aims to contribute to QC protocols by assessing the volume of six clavicle models 3D printed by Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) technology. Two different computed tomography (CT)-based measurement methods were employed. Data was acquired by a diagnostic CT (CT-D), scanner typically used in hospitals for medical imaging and already available at the point-of-care, and an industrial CT (CT-I) scanner, designed for high-precision metrological analysis. CT-I was assumed as the reference to quantify the accuracy and uncertainty of CT-D in the context of 3D printed anatomical models. From the comparison of the experimental results, a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 0.65% was found between CT-D and CT-I. Furthermore, a maximum volumetric discrepancy of 2% was observed between the bone replicas, suggesting that discrepancies exceeding this value could require a reassessment of the printing process.
2025
2025 IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 and IoT, MetroInd4.0 and IoT 2025 - Proceedings
Piscataway, New Jersey
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
9781665457743
Cecchitelli, Marta; Fiori, Giorgia; Luchetti, Alessandro; Galo, Jan; Sciuto, Salvatore Andrea; Scorza, Andrea
Volumetric Assessment for Quality Control in 3D Printed Bone Models: a Preliminary Investigation / Cecchitelli, Marta; Fiori, Giorgia; Luchetti, Alessandro; Galo, Jan; Sciuto, Salvatore Andrea; Scorza, Andrea. - (2025), pp. 101-105. ( 8th IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 and IoT, MetroInd4.0 and IoT 2025 esp 2025) [10.1109/metroind4.0iot66048.2025.11122089].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/465604
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex 3
social impact