This paper investigates how unitizing affects external observers' annotation of group cohesion. We compared unitizing techniques belonging to these categories: interval coding, continuous coding, and a technique inspired by a cognitive theory on event perception. We applied such techniques for sampling coding units from a set of recordings of social interactions rich in behaviors related to cohesion. Then, we compared the cohesion scores the observers assigned to each coding unit. Results show that the three techniques can lead to suitable ratings and that the technique inspired to cognitive theories leads to scores reflecting variability in cohesion better than the other ones.
This paper investigates how unitizing affects external observers' annotation of group cohesion. We compared unitizing techniques belonging to these categories: interval coding, continuous coding, and a technique inspired by a cognitive theory on event perception. We applied such techniques for sampling coding units from a set of recordings of social interactions rich in behaviors related to cohesion. Then, we compared the cohesion scores the observers assigned to each coding unit. Results show that the three techniques can lead to suitable ratings and that the technique inspired to cognitive theories leads to scores reflecting variability in cohesion better than the other ones.
How unitizing affects annotation of cohesion / Ceccaldi, Eleonora; Lehmann-Willenbrock, Nale; Volta, Erica; Chetouani, Mohamed; Volpe, Gualtiero; Varni, Giovanna. - (2019), pp. 248-254. ( 8th International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction, ACII 2019 Cambridge, UK 03-06 Settembre 2019) [10.1109/ACII.2019.8925527].
How unitizing affects annotation of cohesion
Ceccaldi, Eleonora;Varni, Giovanna
2019-01-01
Abstract
This paper investigates how unitizing affects external observers' annotation of group cohesion. We compared unitizing techniques belonging to these categories: interval coding, continuous coding, and a technique inspired by a cognitive theory on event perception. We applied such techniques for sampling coding units from a set of recordings of social interactions rich in behaviors related to cohesion. Then, we compared the cohesion scores the observers assigned to each coding unit. Results show that the three techniques can lead to suitable ratings and that the technique inspired to cognitive theories leads to scores reflecting variability in cohesion better than the other ones.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
How_unitizing_affects_annotation_of_cohesion.pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
899.86 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
899.86 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
|
2209.14186v1.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Pre-print non referato (Non-refereed preprint)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
786.18 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
786.18 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione



