Simultaneous speech translation (SimulST) is the task in which output generation has to be performed on partial, incremental speech input. In recent years, SimulST has become popular due to the spread of multilingual application scenarios, like international live conferences and streaming lectures, in which on-the-fly speech translation can facilitate users' access to audio-visual content. In this paper, we analyze the characteristics of the SimulST systems developed so far, discussing their strengths and weaknesses. We then concentrate on the evaluation framework required to properly assess systems' effectiveness. To this end, we raise the need for a broader performance analysis, also including the user experience standpoint. We argue that SimulST systems, indeed, should be evaluated not only in terms of quality/latency measures, but also via task-oriented metrics accounting, for instance, for the visualization strategy adopted. In light of this, we highlight which are the goals achieved by the community and what is still missing.
Visualization: The missing factor in simultaneous speech translation / Papi, Sara; Negri, Matteo; Turchi, Marco. - 3033:(2021). (Intervento presentato al convegno 8th Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics, CLiC-it 2021 tenutosi a Universita degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, ita nel June 29 - July 1 2022).
Visualization: The missing factor in simultaneous speech translation
Sara Papi
Primo
;Marco TurchiUltimo
2021-01-01
Abstract
Simultaneous speech translation (SimulST) is the task in which output generation has to be performed on partial, incremental speech input. In recent years, SimulST has become popular due to the spread of multilingual application scenarios, like international live conferences and streaming lectures, in which on-the-fly speech translation can facilitate users' access to audio-visual content. In this paper, we analyze the characteristics of the SimulST systems developed so far, discussing their strengths and weaknesses. We then concentrate on the evaluation framework required to properly assess systems' effectiveness. To this end, we raise the need for a broader performance analysis, also including the user experience standpoint. We argue that SimulST systems, indeed, should be evaluated not only in terms of quality/latency measures, but also via task-oriented metrics accounting, for instance, for the visualization strategy adopted. In light of this, we highlight which are the goals achieved by the community and what is still missing.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
paper22.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Post-print referato (Refereed author’s manuscript)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
278.79 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
278.79 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione