The chapter investigates the role of domestic courts in the management of foreign relations (FRs). Combining insights from ongoing trends towards the ‘administrativisation’ of the jurisdictional function and the theoretical approach of Global Administrative Law (GAL), it explores whether and to what extent domestic judicial bodies “administer” FRs, establish coordination relationships and potentially develop a ‘common language’. The GAL approach brings out the role of global regulators of courts in a domain where their influence is often underestimated. With a varying degree of awareness, courts contribute to determine States’ FRs, and this role in contemporary constitutional systems has become structural. However, a survey on the judicial practice in this field suggests that the intervention of judicial bodies may lead to greater disorder, conflict and de-stabilization, thus – and paradoxically – frustrating the purposes of ordering the structures of global governance underlying the GAL project.

Judicial Review, Foreign Relations and Global Administrative Law: The Administrative Function of Courts in Foreign Relations / Golia, Angelo Junior. - (2021), pp. 130-158. [10.1017/9781108942713.008]

Judicial Review, Foreign Relations and Global Administrative Law: The Administrative Function of Courts in Foreign Relations

Golia, Angelo Junior
2021-01-01

Abstract

The chapter investigates the role of domestic courts in the management of foreign relations (FRs). Combining insights from ongoing trends towards the ‘administrativisation’ of the jurisdictional function and the theoretical approach of Global Administrative Law (GAL), it explores whether and to what extent domestic judicial bodies “administer” FRs, establish coordination relationships and potentially develop a ‘common language’. The GAL approach brings out the role of global regulators of courts in a domain where their influence is often underestimated. With a varying degree of awareness, courts contribute to determine States’ FRs, and this role in contemporary constitutional systems has become structural. However, a survey on the judicial practice in this field suggests that the intervention of judicial bodies may lead to greater disorder, conflict and de-stabilization, thus – and paradoxically – frustrating the purposes of ordering the structures of global governance underlying the GAL project.
2021
Encounters between Foreign Relations Law and International Law: Bridges and Boundaries
Cambridge
Cambridge University Press
978-1-108-83774-3
9781108942713
Golia, Angelo Junior
Judicial Review, Foreign Relations and Global Administrative Law: The Administrative Function of Courts in Foreign Relations / Golia, Angelo Junior. - (2021), pp. 130-158. [10.1017/9781108942713.008]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Golia_judicial_review_foreign_relations_and_global_administrative_law.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 2.6 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.6 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/369569
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact