In this paper, we study from an ontological viewpoint some modeling challenges related to the design, realization, and maintenance of engineering systems such as what it means that an assembly complies to a specification and how it persists through time when some of its components are missing or replaced. These challenges intertwine with the missing component and the replacement problems, which are by themselves fundamental from an engineering stance and are thus explicitly addressed in the paper. We describe these topics and for each one we compare different modeling approaches dealing with them, considering also the differences between the three- and four-dimensionalist views. In conclusion, we summarize the comparison of the approaches by highlighting their advantages and shortcomings from an engineering perspective.
Comparing Ontological Alternatives to Model Engineering Systems and Components / Compagno, Francesco; Borgo, Stefano; Masolo, Claudio; Sanfilippo, Emilio. - 2969:(2021), pp. 1-12. (Intervento presentato al convegno FOMI 2021 - JOWO 2021 - The Joint Ontology Workshops - Episode VII: The Bolzano Summer of Knowledge - co-located with the 12th International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems (FOIS 2021), and the 12th International Conference on Biomedical Ontologies (ICBO 2021) tenutosi a Bolzano, Italy nel 11-18 September 2021).
Comparing Ontological Alternatives to Model Engineering Systems and Components
Compagno, Francesco
Primo
;Borgo, StefanoSecondo
;Masolo, ClaudioPenultimo
;Sanfilippo, EmilioUltimo
2021-01-01
Abstract
In this paper, we study from an ontological viewpoint some modeling challenges related to the design, realization, and maintenance of engineering systems such as what it means that an assembly complies to a specification and how it persists through time when some of its components are missing or replaced. These challenges intertwine with the missing component and the replacement problems, which are by themselves fundamental from an engineering stance and are thus explicitly addressed in the paper. We describe these topics and for each one we compare different modeling approaches dealing with them, considering also the differences between the three- and four-dimensionalist views. In conclusion, we summarize the comparison of the approaches by highlighting their advantages and shortcomings from an engineering perspective.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Compagno et al. - Comparing Ontological Alternatives to Model Engine.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
447.16 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
447.16 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione