It has been claimed that numerical rocking motion models are not only inaccurate, but that all rocking structures behave unpredictably. This paper revisits the issue of rocking motion unpredictability and explores whether not the response to a single ground motion, but the statistics of the responses to an ensemble of ground motions is predictable. To this end, a 3D rocking podium structure was constructed and tested on a shake table. A blind prediction contest was organized, where the contestants were invited to predict the CDF of the time-maxima of the responses. There were 13 participant teams that used FEM, DEM and rigid body models. It was found that several teams were able to predict the CDF with a decent accuracy. Both FEM and DEM can perform well, depending on the input parameters. Hence, it can be concluded that 3D rocking motion is predictable in the statistical sense.

3D Rocking Motion: Blind Prediction Contest Results and Influence of Evaluation Metric on the Rankings / Vassiliou, M. F.; Broccardo, M.; Cengiz, C.; Dietz, M.; Dihoru, L.; Gunay, S.; Mosalam, K. M.; Mylonakis, G.; Sextos, A.; Stojadinovic, B.. - 2021-June:(2021). (Intervento presentato al convegno COMPDYN 2021 tenutosi a Athens, Greece nel 28-30 June 2021) [10.3929/ethz-b-000491979].

3D Rocking Motion: Blind Prediction Contest Results and Influence of Evaluation Metric on the Rankings

Broccardo M.;
2021-01-01

Abstract

It has been claimed that numerical rocking motion models are not only inaccurate, but that all rocking structures behave unpredictably. This paper revisits the issue of rocking motion unpredictability and explores whether not the response to a single ground motion, but the statistics of the responses to an ensemble of ground motions is predictable. To this end, a 3D rocking podium structure was constructed and tested on a shake table. A blind prediction contest was organized, where the contestants were invited to predict the CDF of the time-maxima of the responses. There were 13 participant teams that used FEM, DEM and rigid body models. It was found that several teams were able to predict the CDF with a decent accuracy. Both FEM and DEM can perform well, depending on the input parameters. Hence, it can be concluded that 3D rocking motion is predictable in the statistical sense.
2021
8th International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
Grecia
ICONHIC 2022
Vassiliou, M. F.; Broccardo, M.; Cengiz, C.; Dietz, M.; Dihoru, L.; Gunay, S.; Mosalam, K. M.; Mylonakis, G.; Sextos, A.; Stojadinovic, B.
3D Rocking Motion: Blind Prediction Contest Results and Influence of Evaluation Metric on the Rankings / Vassiliou, M. F.; Broccardo, M.; Cengiz, C.; Dietz, M.; Dihoru, L.; Gunay, S.; Mosalam, K. M.; Mylonakis, G.; Sextos, A.; Stojadinovic, B.. - 2021-June:(2021). (Intervento presentato al convegno COMPDYN 2021 tenutosi a Athens, Greece nel 28-30 June 2021) [10.3929/ethz-b-000491979].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
18977.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.1 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.1 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/363845
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact