The capability to store data about Business Process executions in so-called Event Logs has brought to the identification of a range of key reasoning services (consistency, compliance, runtime monitoring, prediction) for the analysis of process executions and process models. Tools for the provision of these services typically focus on one form of reasoning alone. Moreover, they are often very rigid in dealing with forms of incomplete information about the process execution. While this enables the development of ad hoc solutions, it also poses an obstacle for the adoption of reasoning-based solutions. In this paper we exploit the power of abduction to provide a flexible, and yet computationally effective framework able to reinterpret key reasoning services in terms of incompleteness and observability in a uniform and effective way.

The capability to store data about Business Process executions in so-called Event Logs has brought to the identification of a range of key reasoning services (consistency, compliance, runtime monitoring, prediction) for the analysis of process executions and process models. Tools for the provision of these services typically focus on one form of reasoning alone. Moreover, they are often very rigid in dealing with forms of incomplete information about the process execution. While this enables the development of ad hoc solutions, it also poses an obstacle for the adoption of reasoning-based solutions. In this paper we exploit the power of abduction to provide a flexible, and yet computationally effective framework able to reinterpret key reasoning services in terms of incompleteness and observability in a uniform and effective way.

Abducing Workflow Traces: A General Framework to Manage Incompleteness in Business Processes / Federico, Chesani; De Masellis, Riccardo; Di Francescomarino, Chiara; Ghidini, Chiara; Paola, Mello; Marco, Montali; Tessaris, Sergio. - 285:(2016), pp. 1734-1735. ( 22nd European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, ECAI 2016 The Hague, The Netherlands 29 August-2 September 2016) [10.3233/978-1-61499-672-9-1734].

Abducing Workflow Traces: A General Framework to Manage Incompleteness in Business Processes

Di Francescomarino, Chiara;
2016-01-01

Abstract

The capability to store data about Business Process executions in so-called Event Logs has brought to the identification of a range of key reasoning services (consistency, compliance, runtime monitoring, prediction) for the analysis of process executions and process models. Tools for the provision of these services typically focus on one form of reasoning alone. Moreover, they are often very rigid in dealing with forms of incomplete information about the process execution. While this enables the development of ad hoc solutions, it also poses an obstacle for the adoption of reasoning-based solutions. In this paper we exploit the power of abduction to provide a flexible, and yet computationally effective framework able to reinterpret key reasoning services in terms of incompleteness and observability in a uniform and effective way.
2016
ECAI 2016 - 22nd European Conference on Artificial Intelligence
NETHERLANDS
IOS Press
9781614996712
Federico, Chesani; De Masellis, Riccardo; Di Francescomarino, Chiara; Ghidini, Chiara; Paola, Mello; Marco, Montali; Tessaris, Sergio
Abducing Workflow Traces: A General Framework to Manage Incompleteness in Business Processes / Federico, Chesani; De Masellis, Riccardo; Di Francescomarino, Chiara; Ghidini, Chiara; Paola, Mello; Marco, Montali; Tessaris, Sergio. - 285:(2016), pp. 1734-1735. ( 22nd European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, ECAI 2016 The Hague, The Netherlands 29 August-2 September 2016) [10.3233/978-1-61499-672-9-1734].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
FAIA285-1734.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 161.45 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
161.45 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/362689
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact