The available experimental evidence suggests that even two-person normal form games with an elementary action space present substantial degrees of cognitive difficulty. We submit that the relational structure of the players' preferences is a source of complexity of a game. We provide a formal classication of order structures in two-person normal form games, based on the two properties of monotonicity and projectivity, and present an experiment on individual ability to construct a representation of bi-ordered sets isomorphic to the preference structure of paradigmatic normal form games. Experimental results support the hypothesis that relational complexity matters. In particular, they support Schelling's intuition that `mixed motive games' are harder to represent than `pure motive' ones. In addition, the experiment shows that most subjects tend to perceive and extract monotonic relations from non-projective ones. We show that individuals' short term memory capacity limitations signicantly affect their ability to correctly represent bi-orders. Some connections with Rubinstein's analysis of binary relations in natural language are also shortly discussed. JEL codes: C70, C72

Representing others' preferences in mixed motive games: was Schelling right? / Devetag, Giovanna; Warglien, Massimo. - ELETTRONICO. - (2002), pp. 1-26.

Representing others' preferences in mixed motive games: was Schelling right?

Devetag, Giovanna;
2002-01-01

Abstract

The available experimental evidence suggests that even two-person normal form games with an elementary action space present substantial degrees of cognitive difficulty. We submit that the relational structure of the players' preferences is a source of complexity of a game. We provide a formal classication of order structures in two-person normal form games, based on the two properties of monotonicity and projectivity, and present an experiment on individual ability to construct a representation of bi-ordered sets isomorphic to the preference structure of paradigmatic normal form games. Experimental results support the hypothesis that relational complexity matters. In particular, they support Schelling's intuition that `mixed motive games' are harder to represent than `pure motive' ones. In addition, the experiment shows that most subjects tend to perceive and extract monotonic relations from non-projective ones. We show that individuals' short term memory capacity limitations signicantly affect their ability to correctly represent bi-orders. Some connections with Rubinstein's analysis of binary relations in natural language are also shortly discussed. JEL codes: C70, C72
2002
Trento, Italia
Università degli Studi di Trento. Dipartimento di Economia
Representing others' preferences in mixed motive games: was Schelling right? / Devetag, Giovanna; Warglien, Massimo. - ELETTRONICO. - (2002), pp. 1-26.
Devetag, Giovanna; Warglien, Massimo
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
CEEL02_08.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 426.11 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
426.11 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/358368
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact