Evaluating and comparing different ontology matching techniques is a complex multifaceted problem. Currently, diverse golden standards and various practices are used for evaluations. In this paper we show that, by following certain rules, the quality of the evaluations can be significantly improved, particularly in regard to the accuracy of precision and recall measures obtained.
Recommendations for Better Quality Ontology Matching Evaluations / Andrews, Pierre; Autayeu, Aliaksandr; Maltese, Vincenzo. - ELETTRONICO. - (2010), pp. 1-4.
Recommendations for Better Quality Ontology Matching Evaluations
Andrews, Pierre;Autayeu, Aliaksandr;Maltese, Vincenzo
2010-01-01
Abstract
Evaluating and comparing different ontology matching techniques is a complex multifaceted problem. Currently, diverse golden standards and various practices are used for evaluations. In this paper we show that, by following certain rules, the quality of the evaluations can be significantly improved, particularly in regard to the accuracy of precision and recall measures obtained.File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
024.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
742.79 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
742.79 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione
