Strangely, philosophy has not given Francesco Guicciardini the same attention that Niccolò Machiavelli has received, although they both, from different perspectives and diverse backgrounds, focused their work on the very same object: the search for a way to establish in Florence a “well-structured and well-ordered regime that enjoyed genuine liberty” and promote a true political life. Both men thought about this subject from the vantage point of their experiences and their fears. Both belonged to a generation which lived under the constant threat of war, as Machiavelli wrote to Guicciardini (January 3, 1526): “Always, as far back as I can remember, war has either been going on or has been talked about.” Each of them, in his own individual way, was an original scholar and had a great influence on the subsequent philosophical and political tradition. The reason behind Guicciardini’s marginal position in the field of philosophical thought may lie in the posthumous success of his work, due to the late discovery of some of his most influential writings, which included the Dialogo del reggimento di Firenze (Dialogue on the government of Florence) and the final draft of the Ricordi (Maxims), both published only in the second half of the nineteenth century. The popularity he gained in the sixteenth century, and which could have indeed affected the history of ideas, was limited to the Storia d’Italia (History of Italy, 1561) and the partial collection of his Ricordi (1576). Nevertheless, these two works did not fail to have a profound impact on political as well as historical and philosophical thought.

Guicciardini, Francesco / Carta, Paolo. - ELETTRONICO. - (2022), pp. 1443-1451. [10.1007/978-3-319-14169-5_608]

Guicciardini, Francesco

Carta, Paolo
2022-01-01

Abstract

Strangely, philosophy has not given Francesco Guicciardini the same attention that Niccolò Machiavelli has received, although they both, from different perspectives and diverse backgrounds, focused their work on the very same object: the search for a way to establish in Florence a “well-structured and well-ordered regime that enjoyed genuine liberty” and promote a true political life. Both men thought about this subject from the vantage point of their experiences and their fears. Both belonged to a generation which lived under the constant threat of war, as Machiavelli wrote to Guicciardini (January 3, 1526): “Always, as far back as I can remember, war has either been going on or has been talked about.” Each of them, in his own individual way, was an original scholar and had a great influence on the subsequent philosophical and political tradition. The reason behind Guicciardini’s marginal position in the field of philosophical thought may lie in the posthumous success of his work, due to the late discovery of some of his most influential writings, which included the Dialogo del reggimento di Firenze (Dialogue on the government of Florence) and the final draft of the Ricordi (Maxims), both published only in the second half of the nineteenth century. The popularity he gained in the sixteenth century, and which could have indeed affected the history of ideas, was limited to the Storia d’Italia (History of Italy, 1561) and the partial collection of his Ricordi (1576). Nevertheless, these two works did not fail to have a profound impact on political as well as historical and philosophical thought.
2022
Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy
Cham, CH
Springer International Publishing
978-3-319-14169-5
978-3-319-14168-8
978-3-319-14170-1
Carta, Paolo
Guicciardini, Francesco / Carta, Paolo. - ELETTRONICO. - (2022), pp. 1443-1451. [10.1007/978-3-319-14169-5_608]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
978-3-319-14169-5_608 CUT.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: Saggio online Springer
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (Publisher’s layout)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 152.55 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
152.55 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/356721
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact