In the original article, there was a mistake in Figures 9 and 10, and Tables 1 and 2 as published. There was a mistake in the parameters of the validation model presented in Section 3 Results [available in the reference Alves, E. F. (2021)]. The normalized moment of inertia reported in the article (M = 5.1 s) was wrongly multiplied by 4 in the MATLAB/Simulink model. Due to this error, Figures 9 and 10 reported incorrect dynamics, and Tables 1 and 2 reported incorrect values. The values for parameters (ta - t0) and (tb - ta) in Table 1 were incorrectly reported as 25 s and 15 s, respectively. The correct values are 11 s and 18 s, respectively. The value for parameter Ees1 in Table 2 was incorrectly reported as 101.76 kWh, the correct value is 60 kWh. In addition to Figures 9 and 10, and Tables 1 and 2, corrections have subsequently been made to various reported values throughout the article, namely in Section 3 Results, Sub-sections 3.1 study: a wind-powered offshore platform in the North Sea, 3.2 Sizing of the Energy Storage System, and 3.3 Sizing Validation. The corrected Figures 9 and 10, and Tables 1 and 2 appear below. The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Corrigendum: Sizing of Hybrid Energy Storage Systems for Inertial and Primary Frequency Control (Front. Energy Res., (2021), 9, 10.3389/fenrg.2021.649200) / Alves, E. F.; Mota, D. D. S.; Tedeschi, E.. - In: FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH. - ISSN 2296-598X. - 9:(2021). [10.3389/fenrg.2021.718210]
Corrigendum: Sizing of Hybrid Energy Storage Systems for Inertial and Primary Frequency Control (Front. Energy Res., (2021), 9, 10.3389/fenrg.2021.649200)
Tedeschi E.
2021-01-01
Abstract
In the original article, there was a mistake in Figures 9 and 10, and Tables 1 and 2 as published. There was a mistake in the parameters of the validation model presented in Section 3 Results [available in the reference Alves, E. F. (2021)]. The normalized moment of inertia reported in the article (M = 5.1 s) was wrongly multiplied by 4 in the MATLAB/Simulink model. Due to this error, Figures 9 and 10 reported incorrect dynamics, and Tables 1 and 2 reported incorrect values. The values for parameters (ta - t0) and (tb - ta) in Table 1 were incorrectly reported as 25 s and 15 s, respectively. The correct values are 11 s and 18 s, respectively. The value for parameter Ees1 in Table 2 was incorrectly reported as 101.76 kWh, the correct value is 60 kWh. In addition to Figures 9 and 10, and Tables 1 and 2, corrections have subsequently been made to various reported values throughout the article, namely in Section 3 Results, Sub-sections 3.1 study: a wind-powered offshore platform in the North Sea, 3.2 Sizing of the Energy Storage System, and 3.3 Sizing Validation. The corrected Figures 9 and 10, and Tables 1 and 2 appear below. The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione