To meet stakeholder non-technical background, requirements are often presented by analysts in terms of scenarios. While translating requirements into scenarios, details and over-specifications (called Ahab's Legs) need to be added to make requirements concrete and understandable to stakeholders. Despite the expected benefits that they should convey, Ahab's Legs could disturb the requirement validation session. They can, in fact, distract the attention of stakeholders. Valuable discussion time may be wasted when focusing on irrelevant details rather than on the actually relevant ones. In the present paper, we address the Ahab's Leg dilemma and its potential impact on requirement validation sessions. We discuss how to measure the distraction due to Ahab's Legs and what are the possible approaches an analyst can adopt to limit it. Moreover, we present the design of a controlled experiment devoted to measure the impact of Ahab's Legs on requirement validation sessions. In particular, the experiment is meant to (1) estimate the magnitude of the distracting effect, and to (2) assess one of the most promising way to alleviate their negative effect, i.e. by making stakeholder aware of the Ahab's Legs before the validation session. © 2011 IEEE.

Ahab's Leg dilemma: On the design of a controlled experiment / Sabatucci, L.; Ceccato, M.; Marchetto, A.; Susi, A.. - (2011), pp. 69-76. (Intervento presentato al convegno 1st International Workshop on Empirical Requirements Engineering, EmpiRE 2011, Co-located with Requirements Engineering, RE 2011 tenutosi a Trento, ita nel 2011) [10.1109/EmpiRE.2011.6046258].

Ahab's Leg dilemma: On the design of a controlled experiment

Marchetto A.;
2011-01-01

Abstract

To meet stakeholder non-technical background, requirements are often presented by analysts in terms of scenarios. While translating requirements into scenarios, details and over-specifications (called Ahab's Legs) need to be added to make requirements concrete and understandable to stakeholders. Despite the expected benefits that they should convey, Ahab's Legs could disturb the requirement validation session. They can, in fact, distract the attention of stakeholders. Valuable discussion time may be wasted when focusing on irrelevant details rather than on the actually relevant ones. In the present paper, we address the Ahab's Leg dilemma and its potential impact on requirement validation sessions. We discuss how to measure the distraction due to Ahab's Legs and what are the possible approaches an analyst can adopt to limit it. Moreover, we present the design of a controlled experiment devoted to measure the impact of Ahab's Legs on requirement validation sessions. In particular, the experiment is meant to (1) estimate the magnitude of the distracting effect, and to (2) assess one of the most promising way to alleviate their negative effect, i.e. by making stakeholder aware of the Ahab's Legs before the validation session. © 2011 IEEE.
2011
Proceedings - 1st International Workshop on Empirical Requirements Engineering, EmpiRE 2011
Italy
IEEE
978-1-4577-1075-9
Sabatucci, L.; Ceccato, M.; Marchetto, A.; Susi, A.
Ahab's Leg dilemma: On the design of a controlled experiment / Sabatucci, L.; Ceccato, M.; Marchetto, A.; Susi, A.. - (2011), pp. 69-76. (Intervento presentato al convegno 1st International Workshop on Empirical Requirements Engineering, EmpiRE 2011, Co-located with Requirements Engineering, RE 2011 tenutosi a Trento, ita nel 2011) [10.1109/EmpiRE.2011.6046258].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/331299
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact