This work compares formal approaches to define and operate with attack trees and fault trees. We start by investigating similarities between the syntactic structure, semantics, and qualitative analysis, of static attack trees and fault trees. Then we point out differences of the analysis methods and metrics between the two formalisms, providing a deeper insight for their dynamic variants. Finally, we overview several extensions and categorise them using the new concept of dimension, which allows us to compare these extensions and point out research gaps.
Attack Trees vs. Fault Trees: Two Sides of the Same Coin from Different Currencies / Budde, Carlos E.; Kolb, Christina; Stoelinga, Mariëlle. - ELETTRONICO. - 12846:(2021), pp. 457-467. (Intervento presentato al convegno 18th International Conference on Quantitative Evaluation of Systems, QEST 2021 tenutosi a France nel 23–27 August 2021) [10.1007/978-3-030-85172-9_24].
Attack Trees vs. Fault Trees: Two Sides of the Same Coin from Different Currencies
Carlos E. Budde;
2021-01-01
Abstract
This work compares formal approaches to define and operate with attack trees and fault trees. We start by investigating similarities between the syntactic structure, semantics, and qualitative analysis, of static attack trees and fault trees. Then we point out differences of the analysis methods and metrics between the two formalisms, providing a deeper insight for their dynamic variants. Finally, we overview several extensions and categorise them using the new concept of dimension, which allows us to compare these extensions and point out research gaps.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
QEST21_camera_ready.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Article camera-ready
Tipologia:
Post-print referato (Refereed author’s manuscript)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
620.95 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
620.95 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione