The Elementary Pragmatic Model Creativity Technique, a.k.a EPMcreate, is a method for creative requirements discovery. It includes 16 steps corresponding to all the combinations of two stakeholders’ viewpoints. The feasibility and effectiveness of the 16-step process have been confirmed by a number of experiments. The need to reduce the number of steps was observed in the very first experiments run in 2003. To address that problem a four-step creativity technique, POEPMcreate (Power-Only EPMcreate), was defined and tested. This paper describes an experiment comparing two four-step techniques, POEPMcreate and a new technique, ROSEPMcreate (Redundant, Odd Step EPMcreate), resembling traditional requirements elicitation with brainstorming. The results, even if preliminary, seem to indicate that an analyst’s work experience and native language influence the number and innovativeness of requirements he or she generates. The paper also offers Kano categories as a way to evaluate the innovativeness of generated requirements.

Two experiments comparing two four-step EPMcreate-based creativity techniques for requirements elicitation / Herrmann, A.; Mich, L.; Berry, D. M.. - ELETTRONICO. - 2376:(2019), pp. 1-10. (Intervento presentato al convegno Creare at 2019 Joint of International Conference on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality Workshops, Doctoral Symposium, Live Studies Track, and Poster Track, REFSQ-JP 2019 tenutosi a Essen nel 18/03/2019).

Two experiments comparing two four-step EPMcreate-based creativity techniques for requirements elicitation

Mich L.;Berry D. M.
2019-01-01

Abstract

The Elementary Pragmatic Model Creativity Technique, a.k.a EPMcreate, is a method for creative requirements discovery. It includes 16 steps corresponding to all the combinations of two stakeholders’ viewpoints. The feasibility and effectiveness of the 16-step process have been confirmed by a number of experiments. The need to reduce the number of steps was observed in the very first experiments run in 2003. To address that problem a four-step creativity technique, POEPMcreate (Power-Only EPMcreate), was defined and tested. This paper describes an experiment comparing two four-step techniques, POEPMcreate and a new technique, ROSEPMcreate (Redundant, Odd Step EPMcreate), resembling traditional requirements elicitation with brainstorming. The results, even if preliminary, seem to indicate that an analyst’s work experience and native language influence the number and innovativeness of requirements he or she generates. The paper also offers Kano categories as a way to evaluate the innovativeness of generated requirements.
2019
CEUR Workshop Proceedings
Aachen
CEUR-WS
Herrmann, A.; Mich, L.; Berry, D. M.
Two experiments comparing two four-step EPMcreate-based creativity techniques for requirements elicitation / Herrmann, A.; Mich, L.; Berry, D. M.. - ELETTRONICO. - 2376:(2019), pp. 1-10. (Intervento presentato al convegno Creare at 2019 Joint of International Conference on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality Workshops, Doctoral Symposium, Live Studies Track, and Poster Track, REFSQ-JP 2019 tenutosi a Essen nel 18/03/2019).
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
CreaRE_paper1.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: Articolo nei proceedings
Tipologia: Post-print referato (Refereed author’s manuscript)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 397.57 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
397.57 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11572/243754
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact